Abstract:This paper shows how network theory can improve our understanding of institutional investors’ voting behavior and, more generally, their role in corporate governance. The standard idea is that institutional investors compete against each other on relative performance and hence might not cast informed votes due to rational apathy and rational reticence. In other words, institutional investors have incentives to free ride, instead of “cooperating” and casting informed votes. We show that connections of various nature among institutional investors, whether from formal networks, geographical proximity or common ownership, and among institutional investors and other agents, such as proxy advisors, contribute to shaping institutional investors’ incentives to vote “actively.” They also create intricate competition dynamics: competition takes place not only among institutional investors (and their asset managers), but also at the level of their employees and among “cliques” of institutional investors. Employees, who strive for better jobs, are motivated to obtain more information on portfolio companies than may be strictly justified from their employer institution’s perspective, and to circulate it within their network. Cliques of institutional investors compete against each other. Because there are good reasons to believe that cliques of cooperators outperform cliques of non-cooperators, the network-level competition might increase the incentives of institutional investors to collect information. These dynamics can enhance institutional investors’ engagement in portfolio companies and also shed light on some current policy issues such as the antitrust effects of common ownership and mandatory disclosures of institutional investors’ voting.

The Inhibition of Institutional Investor Clique on the Tunneling Behavior

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China

Bank Financing and Corporate Governance

Tunneling or Propping: Evidence from Connected Transactions in China

Tunneling behavior and corporate performance: Evidence from Chinese IPO firms

How does independent director affect tunneling?-Evidence from social networks

Large Shareholder Tunneling and Risk of Stock Price Crash: Evidence from China

Institutional investor network, analyst public information and extreme risks

Tunneling in China: The Remarkable Case of Inter-Corporate Loans

Capital-Market Liberalization and Controlling Shareholders’ Tunneling—Experimental Research in the Context of “Mainland China-Hong Kong Stock Connect”

Institutional Investor Information Sharing, Stock Market Extreme Risk, and Financial Systemic Risk

Tunneling through Non-Operational Fund Occupancy: An investigation based on officially identified activities

Can Independent Directors Deter the Tunneling of Large Shareholders?

Network Analysis to Uncover Stock Comovement from a Chinese Financial Portal.

Institutional Investor Voting Behavior: A Network Theory Perspective

Can Equity Incentive Deter the Tunneling of Large Shareholders?

Tunneling As an Incentive for Earnings Management During the IPO Process in China

Co-Investment Network of ERC-20 Tokens: Network Structure Versus Market Performance

Collateral damage: Evidence from share pledging in China