Opioid-Free Segmental Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia with Intrathecal Sedation for Breast and Axillary Surgery: Report of Four Cases
Paolo Vincenzi,Massimo Stronati,Paolo Isidori,Salvatore Iuorio,Diletta Gaudenzi,Gianfranco Boccoli,Roberto Starnari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S358157
2022-05-10
Local and Regional Anesthesia
Abstract:Paolo Vincenzi, 1 Massimo Stronati, 2 Paolo Isidori, 1 Salvatore Iuorio, 2 Diletta Gaudenzi, 3 Gianfranco Boccoli, 1 Roberto Starnari 2 1 Department of General Surgery, IRCSS-INRCA, Ancona, Italy; 2 Department of Anaesthesiology, IRCSS-INRCA, Ancona, Italy; 3 Department of Perioperative Services, AOU "Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona", Ancona, Italy Correspondence: Paolo Vincenzi, Department of General Surgery, IRCSS-INRCA, Via della Montagnola n 81, Ancona, 60127, Italy, Tel + 39 3394578495, Email Purpose: Few studies have described segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) as primary anesthesiologic method in breast and axillary surgery, documenting the association of intrathecal local anesthetics and opioids. This case series reports an opioid-free scheme of STSA in four elderly patients undergoing major breast and axillary oncological surgery. Patients and Methods: STSA was performed in three female patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy ± axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy for invasive ductal carcinoma and in one male patient undergoing ALND for melanoma metastases. The level of needle insertion was included between T6-8, via a median or paramedian approach. Midazolam (2 mg) and ketamine (20 mg) were used as adjuvants for intrathecal sedation, followed by the administration of hypobaric ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 8 mg. The level of sensory blockade achieved was comprised between C2-3 and T11-12. Postoperative analgesia was maintained through continuous intravenous administration of Ketorolac by an elastomeric pump (90 mg over 24 hrs.). Results: Spinal anesthesia was completed without complications in all patients. Conversion to general anesthesia (GA) and perioperative intravenous sedation were not required. No major postoperative complications and no episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were reported. No rescue analgesic was administered. All patients were discharged in postoperative day 2 and are alive at 30, 29, 27 and 13 months after surgery, respectively. High grade of satisfaction on the anesthesiologic method was expressed by all cases. Conclusion: STSA with local anesthetic plus midazolam and ketamine might be considered a safe and effective alternative to GA, even in surgeries involving the breast and axillary region, particularly in elderly and frail patients. Larger prospective studies are required to validate these findings. Keywords: spinal anesthesia, breast cancer surgery, axillary surgery, intrathecal midazolam, intrathecal ketamine Perioperative care of the elderly comorbid patient has posed a significant challenge to the general surgical community due to increasing age and comorbidities representing the most important risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality, 1 along with the routine utilization of general anesthesia (GA) in major surgical procedures, potentially responsible for an increased perioperative risk to this growing class of patients. Accordingly, regional anesthesia (RA), particularly neuraxial blockade, has been increasingly used as a valid and safe technique, which might improve recovery, minimize adverse effects, and provide better outcomes in terms of perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to GA. 2–4 Neuraxial blockade in spinal and epidural anesthesia is aimed at preventing the spinal reflex inhibition of diaphragmatic and gastrointestinal function, at suppressing the detrimental responses to surgical stress, and at impending the efferent and afferent nerve signals to and from the spinal cord, 5 carrying the potential benefits of decreased respiratory and cardiac complications, 2,6 modulation of the neuroendocrine stress response, 7 improved perioperative pain management, 8 faster return of gastrointestinal function with reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), 8,9 adequate prevention of thromboembolic events 10 and early patient mobilization. In particular, segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA), due to its highly selective spinal block, ensures a better control over both induction and surgical anesthesia with increased sensory-motor blockade, improved cardiovascular and respiratory stability, and a reduced requirement for local anesthetics along with a lower risk of toxicity, representing remarkable advantages of this method compared to lumbar spinal anesthesia and other RA procedures, such as thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB). 11 Nevertheless, though three recent series from our Institution conducted on a large population of elderly patients already illustrated the feasibility, efficacy and s -Abstract Truncated-