Meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.

R. Alikhan,A. Cohen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.83b3.0830460a
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume
Abstract:Assessment of study quality The authors devised a grading system for methodological quality, which was similar to that used by Hommes et al. (see Other Publications of Related Interest no.1), based on the following eight criteria: a prospective study, a randomised study, an adequate description of patients, blinding of the radiologist, outcome assessment of all patients, adequate description of all drop-outs, adequate prophylaxis, and adequate outcome assessment. Each study was given a score for each criterion with higher scores indicating stronger methodology; the maximum score attainable was 15 points. The authors do not state how the papers were assessed for quality, or how many of the reviewers performed the
What problem does this paper attempt to address?