In vitro activity of cefiderocol against a global collection of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a high level of carbapenemase diversity
Christian M Gill,Debora Santini,David P Nicolau,Elif Aktas,Wadha Alfouzan,Lori Bourassa,Adrian Brink,Carey-Ann D Burnham,Rafael Canton,Yehuda Carmeli,Marco Falcone,Carlos Kiffer,Anna Marchese,Octavio Martinez,Spyros Pournaras,Michael Satlin,Harald Seifert,Abrar K Thabit,Kenneth S Thomson,Maria Virginia Villegas,Julia Wille,Thais Teles Freitas Rezende,Zuhal Cekin,Gulsah Malkocoglu,Desirèe Gijón,Layla Abdullah Tarakmeh,Chun Yat Chu,Christoffel Johannes Opperman,Hafsah Deepa Tootla,Clinton Moodley,Jennifer Coetzee,Sophia Vourli,George Dimopoulos,Dalya M Attallah,Giusy Tiseo,Alessandro Leonildi,Cesira Giordano,Simona Barnini,Francesco Menichetti,Vincenzo Di Pilato,Giulia Codda,Antonio Vena,Daniele Roberto Giacobbe,Lars Westblade,Armando Cardona,Lauren Curtis,Ferric Fang,Gina Thomson,Carey-Ann D. Burnham,Abrar K. Thabit,Kenneth S. Thomson,Dalya M. Attallah,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad396
2023-12-28
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Abstract:Abstract Objectives To determine the in vitro activity of cefiderocol in a global collection of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa including >200 carbapenemase-producing isolates. Methods Isolates (n = 806) from the ERACE-PA Surveillance Program were assessed. Broth microdilution MICs were determined for cefiderocol (iron-depleted CAMHB) and comparators (CAMHB). Susceptibility was interpreted by CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints and reported as percent of isolates. The MIC distribution of cefiderocol in the entire cohort and by carbapenemase status was assessed. Results In the entire cohort, cefiderocol was the most active agent (CLSI 98% susceptible; EUCAST 95% susceptible; MIC50/90, 0.25/2 mg/L). Amikacin (urinary only breakpoint) was the second most active, with 70% of isolates testing as susceptible. The percentage of isolates susceptible to all other agents was low (<50%) including meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, piperacillin/tazobactam and levofloxacin. Cefiderocol maintained significant activity against the most commonly encountered carbapenemases including VIM- (CLSI 97% susceptible; EUCAST 92% susceptible) and GES (CLSI 100% susceptible; EUCAST 97% susceptible)-harbouring isolates. The cefiderocol MIC distribution was similar regardless of carbapenemase status, with MIC50/90 values of 0.5/4 mg/L, 0.5/2 mg/L and 0.25/1 mg/L for MBL, serine carbapenemase and molecular carbapenemase-negative isolates, respectively. Conclusions Cefiderocol displayed potent in vitro activity in this global cohort of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa including >200 carbapenemase-harbouring isolates. Cefiderocol was highly active against MBL-producing isolates, where treatment options are limited. These data can help guide empirical therapy guidelines based on local prevalence of carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa or in response to rapid molecular diagnostics.
pharmacology & pharmacy,infectious diseases,microbiology