Assessment of the activity and mechanisms of resistance to cefiderocol and combinations of β-lactams and the novel β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam, taniborbactam, zidebactam, nacubactam, xeruborbactam, and ANT3310 in emerging double-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales
Tania Blanco-Martín,Inmaculada López-Hernández,Belén Aracil,Lucía González-Pinto,Pablo Aja-Macaya,Isaac Alonso-García,Salud Rodríguez-Pallares,Lucía Sánchez-Peña,Michelle Outeda-García,María Pérez-Vázquez,Juan Carlos Vázquez-Ucha,Alejandro Beceiro,Álvaro Pascual,Germán Bou,Lorena López-Cerero,Jesús Oteo-Iglesias,Jorge Arca-Suárez,on behalf of the GEMARA-SEIMC/CIBERINFEC Study Group on the activity and resistance mechanisms to new β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors (PROTECT)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00924-24
IF: 5.938
2024-10-10
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Abstract:ABSTRACT We aimed to investigate the activity of and mechanisms of resistance to cefiderocol and innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in a nationwide collection of double-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. In all, 57 clinical isolates co-producing two carbapenemases collected from Spanish hospitals during the period 2017–2022 were analyzed. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam, aztreonam/avibactam, aztreonam/nacubactam, cefiderocol, cefepime, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime/nacubactam, imipenem, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/xeruborbactam, and meropenem/ANT3310 were determined by reference broth microdilution. Genetic drivers of resistance were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The collection covered nine carbapenemase associations: VIM + OXA-48 (21/57), NDM + OXA-48 (11/57), KPC + VIM (10/57), KPC + OXA-48 (6/57), IMP + OXA-48 (3/57), NDM + KPC (2/57), NDM + VIM (2/57), NDM + GES (1/57), and KPC + IMP (1/57). Ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam were the least active options. Aztreonam/avibactam and aztreonam/nacubactam were active against the whole collection and yielded MIC 50 /MIC 90 values of ≤0.25/0.5 mg/L and 1/2 mg/L, respectively. Cefepime/zidebactam (56/57 susceptible), meropenem/xeruborbactam (56/57 susceptible), cefepime/nacubactam (55/57 susceptible), and cefiderocol (53/57 susceptible) were also highly active, with MIC 50 /MIC 90 values ranging from ≤0.25–2 mg/L to 2–4 mg/L, respectively. Meropenem/ANT3310 (MIC 50 /MIC 90 = 0.5/≥64 mg/L; 47/57 susceptible) and cefepime/taniborbactam (MIC 50 /MIC 90 = 0.5/16 mg/L; 44/57 susceptible) also retained high levels of activity, although they were affected by NDM-type enzymes in combination with porin deficiency. Our findings highlight that cefiderocol and combinations of β-lactams and the novel β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam, nacubactam, taniborbactam, zidebactam, xeruborbactam, and ANT3310 show promising activity against double-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales.
pharmacology & pharmacy,microbiology