Abstract:AIM: Stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) is the performance of participants influenced by the similarity of stimulus and response properties. The dimensional overlap between cue and target also influences the performance of participants. The present study was aimed to investigate whether the compatibility effect occurs when the cues and stimuli overlap non-spatially. Furthermore, it examined the neural basis of SRC in the conditions of cue-response incompatibility and stimulus-response incompatibility. METHODS: The experiment was performed in November 2003 in the laboratory of the School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University. The lab was soundproof and dark. Participants involved in the experiment were 12 undergraduates with right-handedness, with normal or correct-to-normal vision and normal color vision. The materials were two-dimensional and three-dimensional red, green, and blue geometrical shapes. The procedure of a trial was as follows: First, a red cross as the fixation was presented on the central of screen for 1 000 ms; then a cue for 1 000 ms; and a target. The intervals between them were 300 ms. Participants were asked to press the keys, 1, 2, 4 on the response box to make a response. There were 216 trials that lasted about 50 minutes. For a given participant, the experimental conditions were identical and the electrophysiological data were recorded from 200 ms before the targets were presented to 1 000 ms after targets presentation except that during practice no electrophysiological data were recorded. Peak values were measured between 100-160 ms, and between 280-400 ms(for front and central electrode sites: F1, F2, F3, F4, Fz; C1, C2, C3, C4, Cz). Peak values were also measured between 100-160 ms, 170-230 ms, 320-420 ms (for back electrode sites: P1, P2, P3, P4, Pz, O1, O2, Oz). Response accuracy and the reaction time of correct trials were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The data for 12 participants were all involved in the statistical analysis. ①N1 and P3 of frontal and parietal: In time window of 100-160 ms, the main effects of conditions and electrode positions on N1 were significant, while the interaction of conditions and electrode positions did not reach significance. In time window of 280-400 ms, the main effect of conditions on P3 was nearly significant, but the main effect of electrode positions was significant. ②P1,N2, and P3 of occipital: The interaction of conditions and electrode positions on P1 and N2 was not significant. The main effect of conditions on P1 did not reach significance. But the main effect of electrode positions was significant. The main effects of conditions and electrode positions on N2 were nearly significant. However, the interactions on P1 and N2 were not significant. The interaction of conditions and electrode positions on P3 was significant. So, the analysis of simple effects was performed. ③Latency: The main effects of conditions on N1 and P3 of Frontal and Parietal were significant, but there were no significant main effects on P1, N2 and P3 of occipital. N1 of Frontal and Parietal was more sensitive to shapes of stimuli, while P3 was more sensitive to stimulus colors during the earlier performance of SRC tasks.CONCLUSION: The early processing of SRC tasks activates the brain areas of Frontal and parietal, while the later processing, that is response selection, activates brain areas of occipital. N1 of frontal and parietal is more sensitive to shapes of stimuli, but P3 is more sensitive to stimulus color during the earlier performance of SRC tasks. The effects of SRC may result from transformation of vision and action or from the selection of different responses. However, attention plays an important role in the processing of SRC tasks.

The Effects of Directional and Non-Directional Stimuli during a Visuomotor Task and Their Correlation with Reaction Time: An ERP Study

29. ERP generators in an omitted-target oddball task: A simultaneous EEG-fMRI study

Multi-Tasking and Choice of Training Data Influencing Parietal ERP Expression and Single-Trial Detection—Relevance for Neuroscience and Clinical Applications

Attention to Detail: Why Considering Task Demands Is Essential for Single-Trial Analysis of BOLD Correlates of the Visual P1 and N1

The Dominance of Anticipatory Prefrontal Activity in Uncued Sensory–Motor Tasks

ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention

Effects of intermittent visual feedback on EEG characteristics during motor preparation and execution in a goal-directed task

Correlation Between Electrical and Hemodynamic Responses During Visual Stimulation with Graded Contrasts

Modulation of rhythmic visual stimulation on left–right attentional asymmetry

Pearls and pitfalls in brain functional analysis by event-related potentials: a narrative review by the Italian Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Society on methodological limits and clinical reliability—part I

The impact of virtual reality and distractors on attentional processes: insights from EEG

Lessons learned from an fMRI-guided rTMS study on performance in a numerical Stroop task

Early visual modulation and selection predict saccadic timing during visual search: An ERP study

Modulation of Attention in Visual Stimulation Response

The Effect of Short-Term Training on Cardinal and Oblique Orientation Discrimination: an ERP Study

Unsymmetrical Response Features of Left and Right Brain to Signals from Left and Right Visual Fields at Different Cognitive Levels.

Prefrontal Multielectrode Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Performance and Neural Activity Serving Visuospatial Processing

The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study.

Modulation of learning-dependent plasticity in the attention network

An event-related potential study on stimulus-response compatibility and dimensional overlap of non-spatial cue and target

Functionally Independent Components of the Late Positive Event-Related Potential During Visual Spatial Attention