Abstract:Keywords: intellectual property, codification, human rights, private interests, publicinterests, exclusions, medicines, patents The article concerns the expediency of codificationof legislation in the field of intellectual property on the basis of the principles ofpolicy development of pharmaceutical nationalism or pharmaceutical independence ofthe state. Modernity encourages to determine the principles of intellectual propertylaw on the basis of «collective knowledge», to put the intellectual property right toserve the interests of society and provide appropriate incentives for scientific activity.The new spirit of intellectual property dictates the policy of introducing exceptions tointellectual property rights for objects used in the fight against COVID-19.Special attention should be paid to the formation in the world, on the one hand, ofa policy of «pharmaceutical nationalism», which provides for protectionism in relationto the national producer, and on the other — the policy of priority of public interestsover intellectual property rights. Today, this issue is particularly acute in the contextof limited access to vaccines against the background of free production sites of genericcompanies. Therefore, when determining the conceptual approaches to the codificationof legislation in the field of intellectual property, the international experience ofmaintaining such a balance should be taken into account.The path of harmonization of human rights and intellectual property rights hascertain social and economic obstacles, overcoming which requires significant efforts ofpublic organizations, rethinking the established paradigms of the scientific communityand the political will of international organizations. The pandemic has only strengthened our sense that modern science is supranational,it has long been beyond the geographical and beyond the human imagination.That is why the monopolization of its results has become a dangerous phenomenon fora society that has lost the ability to control the processes within itself and has becomedependent on external processes, which are controlled by a small percentage of intellectualproperty market participants.Today, Ukraine has become an Eastern European hub in the field of harmonizationof private and public interests in the field of health care with the mechanisms ofintellectual property rights, and the ongoing patent reform is a breakthrough success.It should be noted that although it is extremely important for Ukraine to be able touse the flexible provisions of the TRIPS Agreement, both for the production of vaccinesand over time for drugs for specific treatment KOVID, the Government shouldkeep in mind the need to clarify the production capacity of domestic producers. , toallow the production of such vaccines and drugs exclusively for the national market,at least at the first stage, as the priority is to meet the needs of the national patient.And, of course, compulsory know-how licenses (trade secrets) should contain provisionslimiting the time and number of doses produced by analogy with compulsory licensesfor inventions.

Intellectual Property as a Part of State Biosafety in Healthcare: disputable issues and identification of key areas of research in wartime

Keeping the balance of public interests and the interests of the subjects of patent rights in the codification of legislation in the field of intellectual property

Role of intellectual property in the development of the state’s innovation potential

LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE BALANCE OF INTERESTS OF THE PUBLIC AND THE INTERESTS OF SUBJECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE FIELD OF HEATCH CARE

NATIONAL STRATEGY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONA OBLIGATIONS

FUNDAMENTALS OF PATENT PROTECTION IN THE FIELD OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Principles of legal protection of intellectual property in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine

Intellectual property rights to the research results of a Ukrainian scientist working abroad and foreign scientists, working in Ukraine

Biosecurity Law in the Context of National Security: New Threats and Countermeasures

Biomedical Ethics and Human Rights in The Context of Innovation and Information Development of Society

Current issues of legal protection intellectual property in Ukraine in the conditions of sustainable development

The protection of intellectual property rights in modern conditions

To the question reform of the state system of legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine

PRINCIPLES OF PATENT PROTECTION IN THE FIELD OF BIOTECHNOLOGY IN EASTERN EUROPE: INFLUENCE OF WESTERN AND EASTERN MODELS

Legal perspectives on innovations and intellectual property rights

DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INSURANCE SYSTEM IN TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES: PERSPECTIVES AND CHALLENGES

Intellectual Property Rights and Access in Crisis

Medical and pharmaceutical activities in occupied territories: legal assessment and Ukraine's experience

Economic aspects of strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights

The flexibilization of intellectual property rights in cases of health crises: A case study of Brazil in the face of the AIDS and COVID sanitary crises

Available drugs during of military state: social-economic strategies of functioning reimbursumen’t system