Abstract:Increasing evidence suggests that state policies impact constituents' health, but political determinants of health and health inequities remain understudied. Using state and year fixed-effects models, we determined the extent to which changes in electoral partisan bias in lower chambers of U.S. state legislatures (i.e., discrepancy between statewide vote share and seat share) were followed by changes in five state policies affecting children and families (1980-2019) and a composite of safety net programs (1999-2018). We examined effects on each policy and whether the effect was modified when bias was accompanied by unified party control. Next, we determined whether the effect differed depending on which party it favored. Less bias resulted only in higher AFDC/TANF benefits. Both pro-Democratic and pro-Republican bias was followed by decreased AFDC/TANF benefits and increased Medicaid benefits. AFDC/TANF recipients, unemployment benefits, minimum wage, and pre-K-12 education spending increased following pro-Democratic bias and decreased following pro-Republican bias. Estimated effects on the composite measure of safety net policies were all close to null. Some effects were modulated by unified party control. Results demonstrate that increasing fairness in elections is not a panacea by itself for increasing generosity of programs affecting children's well-being. Indeed, bias can be somewhat beneficial for the expansiveness of some policies. Furthermore, with the exception of unemployment benefits and AFDC/TANF recipients, Democrats have not been using the additional power that comes with electoral bias to spend more on major programs that benefit children. Finally, after decades in which electoral bias was in Democrats' favor, bias has started to shift toward Republicans in the last decade. This trend forecasts more cuts in almost all the policies in this study, especially education and AFDC/TANF recipients. There is a need for more research and advocacy emphasis on the political determinants of social determinants of health, especially at the state level.

Partisanship, Political Polarization, and State Higher Education Budget Outcomes

Democratic Backsliding and the Balance Wheel Hypothesis: Partisanship and State Funding for Higher Education in the United States

Inequality, Identity, and Partisanship: How redistribution can stem the tide of mass polarization

Influencing a Polarized and Connected Legislature

Life, Literacy, and the Pursuit of Prosperity: Party Competition and Policy Outcomes in 50 States

Divide and Diverge: Polarization Incentives

Party Polarization, Ideological Sorting and the Emergence of the US Partisan Gender Gap

Policy over party: comparing the effects of candidate ideology and party on affective polarization

Beyond the Median Voter: How Affective Polarization Shapes Party Polarization in Multidimensional Ideological Spaces

Why are U.S. Parties So Polarized? A "Satisficing" Dynamical Model

Dynamics of Affective Polarization: From Consensus to Partisan Divides

Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States

How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting

Is fair representation good for children? effects of electoral partisan bias in state legislatures on policies affecting children's health and well-being

Charting multidimensional ideological polarization across demographic groups in the United States

Partisanship, Religion, and Issue Polarization in the United States: A Reassessment

Dramatic Declines in Higher Education Appropriations: State Conditions for Budget Punctuations

An environmental education: how the education realignment polarized Congress on the environment

The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election

The evolution of polarization in the legislative branch of government

Legislative redistricting and the partisan distribution of transportation expenditure