Abstract:Background: The promise of real-world evidence and the learning health care system primarily depends on access to high-quality data. Despite widespread awareness of the prevalence and potential impacts of poor data quality (DQ), best practices for its assessment and improvement are unknown. Objective: This review aims to investigate how existing research studies define, assess, and improve the quality of structured real-world health care data. Methods: A systematic literature search of studies in the English language was implemented in the Embase and PubMed databases to select studies that specifically aimed to measure and improve the quality of structured real-world data within any clinical setting. The time frame for the analysis was from January 1945 to June 2023. We standardized DQ concepts according to the Data Management Association (DAMA) DQ framework to enable comparison between studies. After screening and filtering by 2 independent authors, we identified 39 relevant articles reporting DQ improvement initiatives. Results: The studies were characterized by considerable heterogeneity in settings and approaches to DQ assessment and improvement. Affiliated institutions were from 18 different countries and 18 different health domains. DQ assessment methods were largely manual and targeted completeness and 1 other DQ dimension. Use of DQ frameworks was limited to the Weiskopf and Weng (3/6, 50%) or Kahn harmonized model (3/6, 50%). Use of standardized methodologies to design and implement quality improvement was lacking, but mainly included plan-do-study-act (PDSA) or define-measure-analyze-improve-control (DMAIC) cycles. Most studies reported DQ improvements using multiple interventions, which included either DQ reporting and personalized feedback (24/39, 61%), IT-related solutions (21/39, 54%), training (17/39, 44%), improvements in workflows (5/39, 13%), or data cleaning (3/39, 8%). Most studies reported improvements in DQ through a combination of these interventions. Statistical methods were used to determine significance of treatment effect (22/39, 56% times), but only 1 study implemented a randomized controlled study design. Variability in study designs, approaches to delivering interventions, and reporting DQ changes hindered a robust meta-analysis of treatment effects. Conclusions: There is an urgent need for standardized guidelines in DQ improvement research to enable comparison and effective synthesis of lessons learned. Frameworks such as PDSA learning cycles and the DAMA DQ framework can facilitate this unmet need. In addition, DQ improvement studies can also benefit from prioritizing root cause analysis of DQ issues to ensure the most appropriate intervention is implemented, thereby ensuring long-term, sustainable improvement. Despite the rise in DQ improvement studies in the last decade, significant heterogeneity in methodologies and reporting remains a challenge. Adopting standardized frameworks for DQ assessment, analysis, and improvement can enhance the effectiveness, comparability, and generalizability of DQ improvement initiatives.

A Review of the State of the Art of Data Quality in Healthcare

Assessing Data Quality Within Available Context

Assessing The Practice Of Data Quality Evaluation In A National Clinical Data Research Network Through A Systematic Scoping Review In The Era Of Real-World Data

A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems

Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review

Analysis of Data Quality Problems in the Digital Hospital and Relevant Solutions

A Review of Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services

Data Quality-Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

Data Quality in Health Research: Integrative Literature Review

Big Data Quality: A systematic literature review and future research directions

Data Quality in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment

Common data quality elements for health information systems: a systematic review

Ensuring Data Integrity in Electronic Health Records: A Quality Health Care Implication

Empirical Study of Data Completeness in Electronic Health Records in China

Data quality and Big Data in the health industry: a scoping review protocol

Development of a framework to assess the quality of data sources in healthcare settings

Improving Data Quality in Clinical Research Informatics Tools

Frameworks, Dimensions, Definitions of Aspects, and Assessment Methods for the Appraisal of Quality of Health Data for Secondary Use: Comprehensive Overview of Reviews

The relationship between electronic health records user interface features and data quality of patient clinical information: an integrative review

Barriers and Facilitators to Data Quality of Electronic Health Records Used for Clinical Research in China: a Qualitative Study