Abstract:Background: The promise of real-world evidence and the learning health care system primarily depends on access to high-quality data. Despite widespread awareness of the prevalence and potential impacts of poor data quality (DQ), best practices for its assessment and improvement are unknown. Objective: This review aims to investigate how existing research studies define, assess, and improve the quality of structured real-world health care data. Methods: A systematic literature search of studies in the English language was implemented in the Embase and PubMed databases to select studies that specifically aimed to measure and improve the quality of structured real-world data within any clinical setting. The time frame for the analysis was from January 1945 to June 2023. We standardized DQ concepts according to the Data Management Association (DAMA) DQ framework to enable comparison between studies. After screening and filtering by 2 independent authors, we identified 39 relevant articles reporting DQ improvement initiatives. Results: The studies were characterized by considerable heterogeneity in settings and approaches to DQ assessment and improvement. Affiliated institutions were from 18 different countries and 18 different health domains. DQ assessment methods were largely manual and targeted completeness and 1 other DQ dimension. Use of DQ frameworks was limited to the Weiskopf and Weng (3/6, 50%) or Kahn harmonized model (3/6, 50%). Use of standardized methodologies to design and implement quality improvement was lacking, but mainly included plan-do-study-act (PDSA) or define-measure-analyze-improve-control (DMAIC) cycles. Most studies reported DQ improvements using multiple interventions, which included either DQ reporting and personalized feedback (24/39, 61%), IT-related solutions (21/39, 54%), training (17/39, 44%), improvements in workflows (5/39, 13%), or data cleaning (3/39, 8%). Most studies reported improvements in DQ through a combination of these interventions. Statistical methods were used to determine significance of treatment effect (22/39, 56% times), but only 1 study implemented a randomized controlled study design. Variability in study designs, approaches to delivering interventions, and reporting DQ changes hindered a robust meta-analysis of treatment effects. Conclusions: There is an urgent need for standardized guidelines in DQ improvement research to enable comparison and effective synthesis of lessons learned. Frameworks such as PDSA learning cycles and the DAMA DQ framework can facilitate this unmet need. In addition, DQ improvement studies can also benefit from prioritizing root cause analysis of DQ issues to ensure the most appropriate intervention is implemented, thereby ensuring long-term, sustainable improvement. Despite the rise in DQ improvement studies in the last decade, significant heterogeneity in methodologies and reporting remains a challenge. Adopting standardized frameworks for DQ assessment, analysis, and improvement can enhance the effectiveness, comparability, and generalizability of DQ improvement initiatives.

Common data quality elements for health information systems: a systematic review

A Review of Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services

Assessing The Practice Of Data Quality Evaluation In A National Clinical Data Research Network Through A Systematic Scoping Review In The Era Of Real-World Data

A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems

Development of a framework to assess the quality of data sources in healthcare settings

Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review

Developing a Data Element Repository to Support EHR-driven Phenotype Algorithm Authoring and Execution

Big Data Quality: A systematic literature review and future research directions

Data Structure for Electronic Medical Quality Measures

A systematic literature review on data quality assessment

Exploring online health information quality criteria on social media: a mixed method approach

Data Quality in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Data Quality in Health Research: Integrative Literature Review

Interoperability of heterogeneous health information systems: a systematic literature review

Data Quality-Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment

Improving the data quality in the research information systems

National information system for rare diseases with an approach to data architecture: A systematic review

Identifying and validating the components for the development of an information system for health grey literature in Iran: A mixed method approach

Health Information Systems Evaluation Criteria: Overview of Systematic Reviews

Dimensions of service quality in healthcare: a systematic review of literature