Abstract:The concept of national-oriented translation as a part of the cultural translation theory becomes most relevant during the translation of fiction books into languages where the native speakers’ cultural context is far from what is narrated in the text of the translated work. The problem may be even more complicated if the language of the translated work is not the language of the described culture. This problem is exemplified by the Chinese translation of V. G. Yan’s novel “Genghis Khan”, which was written in Russian and depicts the complexity of socio-cultural processes in Central Asia during the 13th century. The description of the most important elements of material culture presented in the novel reflects the diversity of the material culture of the peoples of Central Asia. The article analyzes typical errors and inaccuracies in the translation of concepts that denote objects of material culture of Central Asian peoples. The authors attempt to identify the causes of translation errors: translator errors that arose due to differences in the semantic systems of the Russian and Chinese languages, as well as errors related to cultural differences between the peoples of Central Asia and China. The methodological basis of the research is Yuri Naida’s concept of dynamic equivalence as well as the principles of functional equivalence of the original and translated texts proposed by L. K. Latyshev. The source of material for the comparative analysis is the translation of the novel “Genghis Khan” into Chinese by Chen Hongfa. As a result of the analysis of errors and generalization of theoretical provisions, the authors propose three translation principles in order to avoid errors in the translation of names for objects of material culture, namely: the principles of “Double definition”, “Semantic correspondence” and “Addition of translation by explaining the connotative meaning of the word”. Adherence to these principles will allow translators to bring the translated text closer to the original text in both functional and communicative as well as semantic and structural ways.

The Mission of the Headless Horseman: on a Migrating Plot in the Chinese “Records of Anomalies”

The Canonicity of Pastemak's Doctor Zhivago

Hundred Eyes or Hundred Wild Geese: An Examination of How Historical Sources were Made in Marco Polo’s Time

On the Issue of the Reception of Chinese "Strange Stories" in Russian Literature

San guo yan yi in translation and its parallels with western literature

The Narrative Motif of the Ghost in Classical Chinese Literature

The One Text in the Many: Separate and Composite Readings of an Early Chinese Historical Manuscript

Interpretation of "The Story of Playing Equestrian Polo in the Record of What Mr.Feng Sees and Hears"

A Comparative Study of Symbols,Variants and Folklore in East Asia

The Rhetoric of Literary Fairy Tales and Their Contextual Receptions: a Case Study of “the Little Match Girl” and “the Happy Prince”

Difficulties in Translating Concepts that Denote Objects and Phenomena of Material Culture of Central Asian Peoples, and the Principles of Overcoming Them (on the Example of the Translation of V. G. Yan’s Novel “Genghis Khan” from Russian into Chinese)

A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Infernal Affairs and the Departed

Cultural Memory and the Epic in Early Chinese Literature: The Case of Qu Yuan 屈原 and the Lisao 離騷

A Critical Response to Western Critics’ Controversial Viewpoints on Chinese Traditional Narrative and Fiction Criticism

The theory of Chinese narrative prose in the early twentieth century.

Overcoming blindness and the music of memory: common motives in the stories by Wang Meng, V. Shukshin, and K. Paustovsky

Mouvance in Medieval Chinese Textual Culture: Lunyu 論語 in a Dunhuang Florilegium

Cross-Cultural Transmission of the Images of "the Story of Three Fishes" in Ancient Europe and Asia and the Relationship Between Texts and Images

“Covert Progression” and Dual Narrative Dynamics

A Tentative Analysis of Difference of Revenge Between Chinese and Western Classical Literature: In the Case of Hamlet and The Orphan of Zhao

The Personal History of Caiyen's Captivity and Return to Han and the Archetype of Diaspora of Ethnic Chinese——On Perspective,Position and Comparability of Comparative Literature Studies