Abstract:Rationale: The GRADE system of clinical recommendations has deontic implications and can discriminate between mandatory, prohibited, and merely permitted medical decisions. Aims and objectives: The recommendation categories of the GRADE framework map onto deontological imperatives that can lead to a better understanding and management of allegations of imprudence and appropriateness of treatments. Allegations made during the worst phase of COVID-19 pandemic are used as a case study for exploring the deontic implications of GRADE. Method: Conceptual theoretical analysis, case study analysis, and argumentation in defence of hypotheses. Results: Strong GRADE recommendations for or against treatment are justified by high-quality evidence and can be construed as ethical obligations and prohibitions. In contrast, when evidence for benefit or harm is of lower quality, GRADE yields weak, discretionary recommendations. In such grey area cases, the absence of a duty to prescribe or refuse to prescribe a requested treatment is compatible with the privilege of considering unproven but possibly beneficial options in a private setting. This privilege, however, does not extend to healthcare policymakers, who have a duty to promote actions that serve the public and whose recommendations should not be guided by personal or idiosyncratic preferences or values. Conclusion: If there is no prima facie evidence that a proposed treatment is harmful, doctors are not negligent in considering it in shared doctor-patient decision-making. But these clinical decisions under uncertainty do not transfer obligations to health authorities, who are not part of the decision-making process in clinical settings. The clinical decision-making process concerns particulars and is guided by contextual and specific reasons that do not fall within the scope of a general policy. Thus, in the context of a serious epidemic in which patients need and demand treatments, if the body of evidence is still changing and fragile, an attitude of tolerance and connivance may ensure a smoother transition to a more stable phase of progress, both in scientific and clinical medicine.

Critically Appraising Pragmatist Critiques of Evidence-Based Medicine: Is EBM Defensible on Pragmatist Grounds?

Professional judgement in clinical practice (part 3): A better alternative to strong evidence-based medicine

'All the King's horses . . .’: the problematical fate of born-again evidence-based medicine: commentary on Greenhalgh, T., Snow, R., Ryan, S., Rees, S., and Salisbury, H. (2015) six 'biases' against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine. BioMed Central Medicine, 13:200

Evidence-Based Medicine: Feminist Criticisms and Implications for Women's Health

Evidence based medicine and justice: a framework for looking at the impact of EBM upon vulnerable or disadvantaged groups

The need for clinical judgement in the application of evidence-based medicine

Radical Thinking: Scientific Rigor and Pragmatism

The epistemology of evidence-based policies and practices: a comment on ‘When is it justified to claim that a practice or policy is evidence-based? Reflections on evidence and preferences’ by Christian Gade

Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?

On the value-ladenness of evidence: a comment on ‘When is it justified to claim that a practice or policy is evidence-based? Reflections on evidence and preferences’ by Christian Gade

Accounting for EBM: notions of evidence in medicine

Applying EBM epistemology and the GRADE system to address practitioners' disagreements in medical malpractice allegations during COVID-19 pandemic

Shifting from Theoretical Best Evidence to Practical Best Evidence: an Approach to Overcome Structural Conservatism of Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Policy

Inquiry of Epistemology in Evidence-based Medicine

The Case for Pragmatic Evidence-Based Higher Education: A Useful Way Forward?

Research and theory for Nursing and Midwifery: Rethinking the Nature of Evidence

A real-world approach to Evidence-Based Medicine in general practice: a competency framework derived from a systematic review and Delphi process

Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research

Evidence-based clinical practice, [corrected] evidence-based medicine and the Cochrane collaboration

Questioning evidence-based practice in physiotherapy: a philosophical reflection. The example of physiotherapy with musicians

Evidence-based medicine: opportunities and challenges in a diverse society