The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a preliminary report

Shashank Raj,Mahesh Prakash,Ashu Rastogi,Anindita Sinha,Manavjit Singh Sandhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.116637
2022-01-01
Polish Journal of Radiology
Abstract:Purpose: To assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).Material and methods: Twenty-five participants with suspected osteomyelitis were included, who underwent MRI including DCE-MRI and DWI sequences. It was subsequently followed by bone biopsy and microbiological analysis (gold standard). The participants were divided into 2 groups based on biopsy results: DFO-positive or DFO-negative. The semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (SI<sub>0</sub>, SI<sub>max</sub>, SI<sub>rel</sub>, wash-in rate [WIR], and type of curve) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were subsequently compared between the 2 groups.Results: Out of the 25 cases, 19 were DFO-positive and 6 were DFO-negative on bone biopsy. The SI<sub>0</sub>, SI<sub>max</sub>, and WIR were significantly higher in DFO-positive cases (<i>p</i>-value 0.050, 0.023, and 0.004, respectively). No difference was seen in SI<sub>rel</sub>. 100% negative cases revealed type-I curve, and 94% of positive cases showed type-II curve. SI<sub>0</sub> &gt; 143.4 revealed a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 83.3%. SI<sub>max</sub> had a sensitivity of 89.5% but lower specificity of 67.7% at a cut-off value of 408.35. The most significant difference was seen with WIR; <i>p</i>-value ~0.004. At the cut-off value of &gt; 1.280, it had a specificity and sensitivity of 100% and 76%, respectively. Also, ADC values below 1.57 × 10<sup>-3</sup> had a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 80% for diagnosing DFO.Conclusions: DWI and DCE-MRI provide non-invasive sequences, which can help to increase the overall specificity and sensitivity of conventional MRI for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, differentiating it from acute Charcot's arthropathy.
English Else
What problem does this paper attempt to address?