Abstract:Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the clear aligners with the traditional fixed appliances in the treatment of premolars extraction complex cases using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). Material and methods: A single-centre, 2-parallel groups RCT with two arms. Forty severe crowding patients (14 males, 26 females; mean age: 21.40±2.42) who required four first premolars extraction were included and randomly allocated into two treatment groups: clear aligners therapy group (CAT), and fixed appliances therapy group (FAT). Cases complexities were measured on pre-treatment records using the Discrepancy index (DI). Post-treatment records were evaluated using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). Two sample t-tests and Fisher's Exact tests were used to test for significant differences between the two groups. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.006 using Bonferroni's correction. Results: For the DI, the mean scores were 32.25 (± 4.33) in the CAT group and 33 (± 7.92) in the FAT group. In the CAT group, the total OGS score ranged between 6-33 points with an average of 17.50(± 7.41), whereas the total score in the FAT group went between 4-30 points with an average of 12.89 (± 6.31) with no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.05). When comparison of the successful cases between the two groups was made, 11 cases received passing scores, and 9 cases received failing scores in the CAT group. Whereas in the FAT group, 17 cases received passing scores, and 3 received a failing score. No statistically significant differences were found in the passing rates between of the CAT and FAT groups (P = 0.421). Conclusions: According to the ABO-OGS total scores, there was no significant difference between the clear aligners and fixed appliances in the treatment of class I severe crowding cases with first premolars extraction in young adults. There were no differences between the two techniques in the OGS components scores except for the occlusal contacts, which were significantly better with the fixed appliances. When comparing the number of successful and failed cases between the two groups, no significant differences were noted, with the fixed appliances having a 30% higher success rate than the clear aligners, which must be considered clinically when choosing between these two techniques in the complex orthodontic cases treatment.

Comparative evaluation of treatment effects between two fixed functional appliances for correction of class II malocclusion

Comparative evaluation of treatment effects between two fixed functional appliances for correction of class II malocclusion

Comparison of Dentoskeletal Changes In Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using two Different Fixed Functional Appliances: A 2 Case Report

A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance

Efficacy of Mandibular protraction appliance IV versus PowerScope in treatment of class II malocclusion; A comparative, randomized clinical trial

A COMPARATIVE EVALUVATION OF HERBST APPLIANCE AND THE ADVAN SYNC 2 IN THE TREATMENT OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of two Class II correctors in treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Comparison of 2 treatment protocols using fixed functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: Treatment results and stability

Effects of Removable Functional Appliances on the Dentoalveolar Unit in Growing Patients

Comparative evaluation of the dentoalveolar effects of three Class II correctors: A finite element analysis study

Removable versus fixed myo-functional appliances in class II malocclusion among Indians

Assessment of the condylar response of two differently anchored fixed functional appliances in class II malocclusion in young adult orthodontic patients: A randomized clinical trial

Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Class II treatment with functional appliances: A meta-analysis of short-term treatment effects

Treatment effectiveness of young adults using clear aligners versus buccal fixed appliances in class I malocclusion with first premolar extraction using the ABO-Objective Grading System: A randomized controlled clinical trial

The comparison of soft tissue profile after treatment with fixed functional appliance, with dental anchorage and skeletal anchorage systems

Dentoskeletal effects of functional appliances vs bimaxillary surgery in hyperdivergent Class II patients

The effect of different functional appliances on the sagittal pharyngeal airway dimension in skeletal class II: a retrospective study

Effect of functional appliance therapy on the quality of life in skeletal Class II malocclusion

Comparative Analysis of Skeletal Changes, Occlusal Changes, and Palatal Morphology in Children with Mild Class III Malocclusion Treated with Elastodontic Appliances and Bimaxillary Plates

Evaluation of the External Soft Tissue Changes Following the Correction of Class II Skeletal Malocclusion in the Adolescence Period Using Removable and Fixed Functional Appliances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis