Abstract:Feedback plays a crucial role in the writing processes. However, in the literature on foreign language (FL) writing, there is a dearth of studies that compare the effects of teacher feedback and automated feedback on both cognitive and psychological aspects of FL writing. To fill this gap, the current study compared the effects of teacher feedback and automated feedback on both revision quality and writing proficiency development (i.e., the cognitive aspects), and perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the feedback (i.e., the psychological aspects) in English writing among English learners as an FL (EFLs) in China. It also investigated students' perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the two types of feedback. The study adopted a mixed-methods design. The quantitative method collected the data through (1) a pre-test and a post-test, which measured the participants' English writing proficiency development; (2) a writing task, which received either teacher feedback or automated feedback; and (3) a close-ended questionnaire, which examined students' perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the feedback. The qualitative method collected the data through an open-ended questionnaire, which examined the participants' perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of teacher feedback or automated feedback depending on the type of feedback they received. Chinese university EFLs in two English classes ( n = 35 in each class) taught by the same English teacher participated in the study: one class received teacher feedback while the other received automated feedback using Pigaiwang. While the students in the two classes did not differ significantly on the pre-test of students' writing proficiency, students who received teacher feedback scored significantly higher on revision than those who received automated feedback. Students in the teacher feedback class also had significantly higher ratings on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the feedback than those in the automated feedback class. However, students in the automated feedback class obtained significantly higher scores on the post-test of the writing proficiency. The qualitative results identified three themes of strengths and two themes of weaknesses for the teacher feedback and the automated feedback, respectively. The results suggest that while teacher feedback has a more positive effect on the psychological aspect of FL writing, automated feedback may be more effective in developing FL writing proficiency in the long run.

Comparing English Language Learners’ Perceptions of How Reliable Computer-Based, Teacher-Based, and Peer Feedback Is: A Case Study

Computer-Based Feedback (CBF) in Writing Classes as Perceived by Saudi EFL Students

Comparing peer, ChatGPT, and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing: Students' perceptions and preferences

EFL Saudi Student's attitudes toward peer feedback activities in a writing class

Saudi EFL Students' Responses to Written Corrective Feedback on Writing

Exploring the impact of teacher feedback modes and features on students' text revisions in writing

The University Students’ Beliefs towards Corrective Feedback in Learning English as Foreign Language in Pakistan

Assessing the effect of giving and receiving written corrective feedback on improving L2 writing accuracy: does giving and receiving feedback have fair mutual benefit?

Comparison of English Teacher Feedback and Automated Writing Feedback on the Quality of English Language Learners’ Essay Revision

The Effects of Teacher Feedback and Automated Feedback on Cognitive and Psychological Aspects of Foreign Language Writing: A Mixed-Methods Research

REVISITING SAUDI UNIVERSITY EFL LEARNERS’ ENGAGEMENT TO TEACHERS WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FROM A SOCIO-COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE

Effectiveness of Teacher and Peer Feedback in EFL Writing: A Case of High School Students

Saudi EFL Students’ Perceptions of Pedagogical Translanguaging in English Medium Instruction

Different Sequences of Feedback Types: Effectiveness, Attitudes, and Preferences.

The influence of nonautonomous online collaborative writing on EFL learners

Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course

Student engagement with teacher and automated written corrective feedback on L2 writing: A multiple case study

The Role of Automated Corrective Feedback in Improving EFL Learners' Mastery of the Writing Aspects

Effectiveness Of Peer Feedback On Second Language Learners

Effects of teacher intervention and type of peer feedback on student writing revision

The effectiveness of teachers’ written and verbal corrective feedback (CF) during formative assessment (FA) on male language learners’ academic anxiety (AA), academic performance (AP), and attitude toward learning (ATL)