Abstract:The study of teachers’ cognition and classroom practices about online corrective feedback in English language teaching is a recent trend in research. However, there is a paucity of studies on teachers’ practices and cognition of online corrective feedback in speaking class. Therefore, this study attempts to bridge this research gap by investigating Saudi female English language teachers’ cognition and practices related to corrective feedback in an online speaking setting. The main question of this study is What are Saudi female EFL teachers’ practices and tacit beliefs about online corrective feedback? The participants of the study were five Saudi female teachers. This study applied a qualitative case study approach dealing with in-depth data collection instruments, including online class observations followed by face-to-face semi-structured and stimulated recall interviews, which interacted with each other through a practical argument process. The results revealed how the teachers’ online corrective feedback beliefs shaped their practices. The observational data revealed that all five teachers corrected most of their students’ errors using various online corrective feedback strategies. The observational data revealed that most teachers used output-prompting strategies more commonly than input-providing strategies, reflecting teachers’ interest in prompting self-correction discovery and reducing the students’ need for assistance. This study thus provides a deeper insight into the complexity of teachers’ cognitions and practices regarding online corrective feedback. Implications of the findings of this study in teacher education are highlighted, and recommendations for further research are suggested.

The University Students’ Beliefs towards Corrective Feedback in Learning English as Foreign Language in Pakistan

Assessing the Impact of Written Corrective Feedback Strategies on the Writing Proficiency of Senior High School Students

Do Indirect Coded Corrective Feedback and Teachers Short Affective Comments Improve the Writing Performance and Learners Uptake?

L2 Teachers’ Oral Corrective Feedback Practices in Relation to Their CF Beliefs and Learner Uptake

Teachers’ Beliefs and Practice on Providing EFL Written Corrective Feedback

The effectiveness of teachers’ written and verbal corrective feedback (CF) during formative assessment (FA) on male language learners’ academic anxiety (AA), academic performance (AP), and attitude toward learning (ATL)

High-School Students’ Beliefs about Oral Corrective Feedback in EFL Classroom: A Survey Study

High school EFL students’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback: The role of gender, motivation and extraversion

EFL Learners’ Attitude towards Teacher’s and Peers’ Written Corrective Feedback

Investigating English Language Learners’ Beliefs about Oral Corrective Feedback at Chinese Universities: a Large-Scale Survey

Comparing English Language Learners’ Perceptions of How Reliable Computer-Based, Teacher-Based, and Peer Feedback Is: A Case Study

STUDENTS’ BELIEFS ON CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN LANGUAGE LEARNING: BASIS FOR DEVELOPING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ TYPOLOGY

Saudi EFL Students' Responses to Written Corrective Feedback on Writing

Investigating EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices about Written Corrective Feedback: A Large-scale Study

Effects of Explicit Written Corrective Feedback on Subject-Verb Agreement among Kurdish EFL Students

Students Attitudes Towards Oral Corrective Feedback: A Case Study from Oman

Investigating composition instructors' written feedback practices at KSAU-HS of the academic year 2022-23

Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Employed by University English Lecturers: A Teacher Cognition Perspective

THIRTY-TWO YEARS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Computer-Based Feedback (CBF) in Writing Classes as Perceived by Saudi EFL Students

Saudi Female EFL Teachers’ Cognition and Practices Regarding Online Corrective Feedback in Speaking Class