Abstract:Directive 2000/53/EC and the European Circular Economy Package (2018) required the Member States to take all the necessary measures to reach the reuse-recycling goal of 85% for end-of-life vehicles (ELVs). In 2019, Europe achieved 89.6% of reuse-recycling, but most EC countries are still not completely compliant, Italy standing, for example, at only 84.2%. For this reason, actions are necessary to increase reuse-recycling for the waste generated in the operations of ELV shredding and separation, known as automobile shredded residues (ASRs). This study was aimed at assessing if the assimilation of ASRs to a solid recovered fuel (SRF) was a feasible solution. That would allow the waste to lose its status (end-of-waste, EoW), thus increasing the recycling rate. The assimilation of ASRs to SRFs requires the compliance with a series of parameters, namely net calorific value (NCV), content of chlorine (Cl), mercury (Hg) and selected heavy metals. The above-mentioned parameters were analyzed in the principal ASR fractions, namely textile, plastic and foam rubber, found in the samples collected during four sampling campaigns (2017-2021) performed at the same ELV treatment plant. Notwithstanding the great variability observed in the four samples, the results of the analyses revealed that the three fractions were compliant with NCV, Cl and Hg content. Conversely, the heavy metals' content was found a more critical parameter, in fact only the plastic fraction was suitable for SRF assimilation. Textiles presented criticality for the content of copper (Cu), nickel (Ni) and antimony (Sb). The heavy metals' contamination of foam rubber was found to be strongly related to particles' dimensions. A model which put particle size and metals' content into relationship was developed and validated. Removing particles of <40 mm significantly improved the quality of the material, however the content of Cu and Ni remained a critical issue for particles up to 200 mm. The SRF assimilation of the plastic fraction would increase the reuse-recycling rate of approx. 2.4-3.3%, thus allowing the achievement of the EC goals concerning the ELV management.

How Much Can Chemical Recycling Contribute to Plastic Waste Recycling in Europe? An Assessment Using Material Flow Analysis Modeling

The role of chemical and solvent-based recycling within a sustainable circular economy for plastics

Material flow analysis and recycling performance of an improved mechanical recycling process for post-consumer flexible plastics

Chemical recycling of plastic waste for sustainable polymer manufacturing – A critical review

Recycling of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in the EU: Recovery rates, material flows, and barriers

Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential of European Union’s Circularity Related Targets for Plastics

Recycling of Plastics as a Strategy to Reduce Life Cycle GHG Emission, Microplastics and Resource Depletion

Resource (in)efficiency in the EU: a case of plastic waste

Greenhouse gas benefits from direct chemical recycling of mixed plastic waste

Exposing the pitfalls of plastics mechanical recycling through cost calculation

Plastic recycling stripped naked – from circular product to circular industry with recycling cascade

Developments in the life cycle assessment of chemical recycling of plastic waste – A review

An LCA answer to the mixed plastics waste dilemma: Energy recovery or chemical recycling?

Waste to Wealth: Chemical Recycling and Chemical Upcycling of Waste Plastics for a Great Future

Is the assimilation to a solid recovered fuel a viable solution for automobile shredder residues’ management?

Practical ways to recycle plastic: current status and future aspects

From plastic waste to wealth using chemical recycling: A review

Sustainability Impact Assessment of Increased Plastic Recycling and Future Pathways of Plastic Waste Management in Sweden

Waste Polypropylene Plastic Recycling toward Climate Change Mitigation and Circular Economy: Energy, Environmental, and Technoeconomic Perspectives

Economic and environmental assessment of automotive plastic waste end‐of‐life options: Energy recovery versus chemical recycling

Life Cycle Assessment on Chemical Recycling-aided Cascaded Use of Polypropylene Plastics