Abstract:The subject of this article is the system of regulation of cross-border data flows and its legal regime. Data is a fundamental resource for the development of the digital economy. Today, with the great development of globalization, the presence of cross-border data flows in international trade is inevitable. However, the transfer of data abroad creates hidden threats to the confidentiality of personal information of citizens and national security. Many countries have established data transfer management systems to protect their own interests. Mature data transfer management regimes abroad often become an example for other countries. The adopted laws also served as a model for other countries. The most representative regimes currently exist in the EU, the USA and China, which demonstrate three ways of managing data. The purpose of this article is to compare the regimes of cross–border data transmission in the European Union, the United States and China in order to analyze the structure of the three representative regimes, as well as to study the causes of their formation and the consequences of their functioning. Considering the three systems makes it possible to show more clearly that the European Union, the United States and China have different value orientations, which directly led to the formation of three different legal systems. The free market and national security have become the main elements of national considerations in the development of laws on cross-border data. Based on the conducted research, it can be concluded that the regime of cross-border data transfer in the EU is the most complete and effective, having a demonstration effect. The Chinese system currently has serious flaws. And in recent years, US law has been increasingly focused on serving the interests of geopolitics. Laws on cross-border data transfer demonstrate trends in political instrumentalization. The Balkanization of the Internet is becoming more and more obvious.

Security and Openness China's Cross-Border Data Flow Scheme

Cross-border Data Flow Governance: The Integration of International Experience and China's Modernization Path

THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CROSS-BORDER DATA TRANSFER BETWEEN MAINLAND CHINA AND HKSAR

Governance in the Free Cross-border Flow of Data

China's Law and Policy on Cross-border Data Flow: A Review of Digital Silk Road

Data Privacy: from Transparency to Fairness

China's cross-border data sharing requirements: Compliance challenges for global institutions

International Law Protection of Cross-Border Transmission of Personal Information Based on Cloud Computing and Big Data

Analysis of the Legal Regulation of Cross-border Flow of Financial Data in China

The main models of cross-border data transmission regimes: EU, USA and China

Legal Regulation of Transnational Data Flows: International Experience and Chinese Solutions

Pluralism and Co-opetition: the Shift in the Governance of Cross-Border Data Flows and the Transformation of State Authority

Regulatory Approaches of Cross-border Data Flow in the Big Data Era: China’s Choice

Global data governance at a turning point? Rethinking China-U.S. cross-border data flow regulatory models

Legal Regulation Risks and Insights Related to Cross-Border Flow of Data

Governing Cross-Border Data Flows: International Trade Agreements and Their Limits

Long-Arm Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Data Flows: EU-US Gaming and Balancing

General Design of Self-Governing Openness of Data and the Exploring of the New Mode of Governance

Tension between the safe flow of government data across organizational boundaries and fragmentations in secure collaboration: the Chinese e-government

Towards a paradigm for open and free sharing of scientific data on global change science in China

Privacy Preservation in Self-Governing Openness of Data