Abstract:The subject of this article is the system of regulation of cross-border data flows and its legal regime. Data is a fundamental resource for the development of the digital economy. Today, with the great development of globalization, the presence of cross-border data flows in international trade is inevitable. However, the transfer of data abroad creates hidden threats to the confidentiality of personal information of citizens and national security. Many countries have established data transfer management systems to protect their own interests. Mature data transfer management regimes abroad often become an example for other countries. The adopted laws also served as a model for other countries. The most representative regimes currently exist in the EU, the USA and China, which demonstrate three ways of managing data. The purpose of this article is to compare the regimes of cross–border data transmission in the European Union, the United States and China in order to analyze the structure of the three representative regimes, as well as to study the causes of their formation and the consequences of their functioning. Considering the three systems makes it possible to show more clearly that the European Union, the United States and China have different value orientations, which directly led to the formation of three different legal systems. The free market and national security have become the main elements of national considerations in the development of laws on cross-border data. Based on the conducted research, it can be concluded that the regime of cross-border data transfer in the EU is the most complete and effective, having a demonstration effect. The Chinese system currently has serious flaws. And in recent years, US law has been increasingly focused on serving the interests of geopolitics. Laws on cross-border data transfer demonstrate trends in political instrumentalization. The Balkanization of the Internet is becoming more and more obvious.

Cross-border Data Flow Governance: The Integration of International Experience and China's Modernization Path

Global data governance at a turning point? Rethinking China-U.S. cross-border data flow regulatory models

Regulatory Approaches of Cross-border Data Flow in the Big Data Era: China’s Choice

Governing Cross-Border Data Flows: International Trade Agreements and Their Limits

Long-Arm Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Data Flows: EU-US Gaming and Balancing

Legal Regulation of Transnational Data Flows: International Experience and Chinese Solutions

Data Privacy: from Transparency to Fairness

The main models of cross-border data transmission regimes: EU, USA and China

Cross-border Data Flows: Regulations in international digital trade and China’s solution

The Game Process and Achievement of EU and US Cross Border Data Flow Rules

Overview of Regulations on Cross Border Data Flow

Cross-Border Data Flows, the GDPR, and Data Governance

Pluralism and Co-opetition: the Shift in the Governance of Cross-Border Data Flows and the Transformation of State Authority

Governance in the Free Cross-border Flow of Data

China's Law and Policy on Cross-border Data Flow: A Review of Digital Silk Road

International Law Protection of Cross-Border Transmission of Personal Information Based on Cloud Computing and Big Data

Analysis of the Legal Regulation of Cross-border Flow of Financial Data in China

Security and Openness China's Cross-Border Data Flow Scheme

Data Policy Restrictions and Cross-border E-commerce: Evidence from China

Legal Regulation Risks and Insights Related to Cross-Border Flow of Data

Issues in China's Alignment with DEPA Data Cross-Border Regulation