Local emergency management special issue: a foreword by Dr Barry Quirk CBE
Barry Quirk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1598708
2019-05-04
Local Government Studies
Abstract:This special issue of focuses on the challenges involved in preparing for, and responding to, disasters and crises. The collection of insights, evidence and best practice set out in this issue deserves the closest of attention by all public servants, practitioners and students of public service generally. For it is when disaster strikes that government and public servants are tested in real time.For some three decades, the workings of government, at national, regional and local level, have been seen through the prism of new public management (NPM). The emphasis has been on the apparent weakness of the government in achieving its intended goals and thereby on the potential of new methods of organisation and management to improve cost-effective service outcomes.More recently, this NPM prism has broadened to incorporate organisational approaches that seek better outcomes based on service co-design with users as well as on more creative collaboration between public agencies in solving social problems. But even by 2019, for better or worse, public agencies and public management are still narrowly viewed as an instrument for delivering public infrastructure, achieving better service outcomes and allocating public goods. By contrast, far too little attention has been placed on the foundational role of the state in minimising public 'bads' and public risks (Quirk 2011 Quirk, B. 2011. Reimagining Government: Public Leadership and Management in Challenging Times. London: Red Globe Press.[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]).The basis of our understanding of the modern relationship between citizens and the state begins with Thomas Hobbes. The essence of his argument is that we covenant to subject ourselves to a city or body politic as citizens in exchange for the state providing us with security (Skinner 2008 Skinner, Q. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]). In the mid-seventeenth century, this was viewed by Hobbes as providing citizens with security from the brutal instincts of others; with the unfolding of modernity, this is now more usually viewed as security from excessive risk and chronic uncertainty.From this Hobbesian perspective, it is clear that many of the disasters that beset communities across the world can undercut the very covenant between citizens and the state. That is why it is not the disaster which is the focus of public attention but the apparent failure of the state: failure to foresee the consequence of embedded system weaknesses (Clearfield and Tilcsik 2018 Clearfield, C., and A. Tilcsik. 2018. Meltdown: Why Our Systems Fail and What We Can Do about It. London: Atlantic Books. [Google Scholar]); failure to prepare for potential catastrophic events; and failure to 'build back better' through effective recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction (United Nations 2015 United Nations. 2015. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/43291. [Google Scholar]).This special issue is, therefore, an extremely useful corrective. It shows how the state at national, regional and local level needs to work collaboratively in disaster preparedness and response. And it illustrates the importance of organisational agility and adaptability while acknowledging the importance of community resilience and preparedness.Working with communities that are in the midst of a disaster requires a disciplined approach to the detail of getting things right. But it also requires-Abstract Truncated-
public administration,political science,regional & urban planning