Abstract:The article explores the legal nature of advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice. It has been established that advisory jurisdiction consists of at least two main elements – ratione personae and ratione materiae. The original power to request advisory opinions is given to the General Assembly and the Security Council. The Court’s case-law demonstrates that political aspects of question or political motives don’t give any grounds to refuse the request for an advisory opinion. The advisory opinions de jure are not legally binding. However, in practice, due to its quality and the status of the International Court of Justice, the advisory opinions are authoritative. In order for the advisory opinion to be authoritative, it is important that the Court’s position is not divided. Advisory proceedings in its form are similar to the proceedings in disputes, indicating the judicial nature of the advisory opinions. It has been found that in practice, the bodies that requested an advisory opinions of the ICJ, as a rule, follow them. An analysis of the interpretation and application by the Court of the international treaties in the advisory opinions demonstrates that the Court acts as the main judicial organ of the United Nations. There has been established the indirect influence of the ICJ on the formation of an international custom through the use of resolutions of the UN agencies as proof of opinio juris. In the advisory opinion Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations International Court of Justice has created a new rule of international customary law regarding the status of a legal entity in international organizations and, consequently, personal legal personality. It is also worth mentioning the advisory opinion Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, by which the Court has given an impetus to the development of international customary law in the area of reservations to multilateral treaties, in particular with humanitarian purposes. In the advisory opinion of the Western Sahara, the Court not only substantiated the universality of the principle of self-determination, but also clarified what features, in it’s opinion, should have the will of the people. In the advisory opinion Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons the Court substantiated that the rules of international humanitarian law became part of international customary law. Advisory opinion Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory has contributed to the understanding of a number of norms as customary. In particular, the Court confirmed the customary nature of the Hague Convention Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land of 1907. In addition, the Court noted that the obligation to respect the right of other peoples to self-determination was a commitment erga omnes. Key words: court; law; justice; dispute; advisory opinion; case-law; custom.

COSIS Request for an Advisory Opinion: A Poisoned Apple for the ITLOS?

Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law, Case 31

On the request for an advisory opinion on climate change under UNCLOS before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

Integrating Climate Change into Global Ocean Governance: The ITLOS Advisory Opinion on the Specific Obligations of State Parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment: Taking Stock and Prospects

Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) (ITLOS)

Advancement of the Duty to Cooperate in Marine Environmental Protection in the Jurisprudence of ITLOS

State responsibility for illegal, unreported and unrelated fishing and sustainable fisheries in the EEZ: some reflections on the ITLOS Advisory Opinion of 2015

Taking the current when it serves: Prospects and challenges for an ITLOS advisory opinion on oceans and climate change

The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to the Protection of the Marine Environment

The itlos Jurisprudence Regarding the Procedural Obligation to Conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment and Its Significance for Deep Seabed Mining

The contribution of the law of the sea convention to marine environmental protection: 40 years of shimmering seas or high hopes dashed against juridical rocks?

The IMLI Treatise On Global Ocean Governance

Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the Settlement of Marine Environmental Disputes under UNCLOS

Legal Nature of Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice

Policies for Potentially Inundated Island Nations for the Retention of Marine Resources and Rights of Associated Under-Water Features and Exclusive Economic Zones

Undermining by Mining? Deep Seabed Mining in Light of International Marine Environmental Law

Beyond AOSIS: small island states' presence and participation at COP27

CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HISTORY Appellate Mechanism in Investment Arbitration: Novis Inventis or Sophistication of Existing Mechanism?

Reflections on the M/V “Norstar” Case Before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

The Use of Precedent and External Case-Law by the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea