Abstract:Virtual ergonomic analyses can be used to guide significant engineering decisions and, therefore, must provide an accurate representation of real-world scenarios. To increase realism and reduce simulation effort, the Jack™ software includes the ability to predict postures that individuals would adopt when performing diverse tasks. In four simulation manual exertion tasks, we compared joint angles and the outputs of ergonomic analyses that were based on the postures produced by humans and those predicted the Jack™ software. Not all postures were well predicted by the software. This work shows the sensitivity of ergonomic tools to posture accuracy and highlights the importance of professional judgement when simulating human behaviors to ensure good decisions when evaluating work-task designs. Additionally, this work may help to refine the prediction algorithms within tools like Jack™. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: To help control work-related injuries, numerous companies have elected to use computer-aided digital human simulation tools to identify and resolve ergonomic issues early in the design of the products and processes. To reduce the burden of manually posturing a digital, the Jack™ Human Simulation Software has incorporated posture prediction capabilities. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the results obtained from Jack™ (version 8.0.1), in terms of joint angles and ergonomic analyses, using postures obtained from lab-based manual tasks to those predicted by the software. Methods: Twenty-seven participants completed four hand-exertion tasks. Surface marker data were transferred into the Jack™ software, which were used to reconstruct whole-body postures. Using the same foot restriction zone, hand location(s) and force efforts, the whole-body postures were also predicted using the software. Joint angles and outputs of ergonomic analyses (lumbar spine forces and joint strength capabilities) generated using the two methods were compared. Results: Significant differences between “real” and predicted postures were found for some joint angles, lumbar spine forces, and joint strength capabilities. Specifically, in the four tasks at least 5 of the 10 joints examined had significantly different angles between the real and predicted postures, with the largest difference being 40.4°. Among 15 correlations assessed, only one strong positive relationship was found between the real and predicted postures. Conclusions: An important difference in posturing strategy was noted between the real and predicted results. Our work illustrates the importance of accurate manikin postures when ergonomically evaluating work-related tasks within a digital environment, and emphasizes the need for professional judgement when simulating human behaviors even if the software has the capability to predict such behaviors. While posture prediction capabilities in Jack™ are a good way to rapidly, and repeatably create a posture, much more work is needed to understand complex movements and motion sequences, to improve existing prediction algorithms and more accurately represent human behaviors within a digital environment.

Prevent Workers from Injuries in the Brewing Company via Using Digital Human Modelling Technology

Using Digital Human Modelling to Evaluate the Risk of Musculoskeletal Injury for Workers in the Healthcare Industry

A new muscle fatigue and recovery model and its ergonomics application in human simulation

Inertial Motion Capture-Driven Digital Human for Ergonomic Validation: A Case Study of Core Drilling

Improving Workers' Musculoskeletal Health During Human-Robot Collaboration Through Reinforcement Learning

Leveraging Digital Perceptual Technologies for Remote Perception and Analysis of Human Biomechanical Processes: A Contactless Approach for Workload and Joint Force Assessment

Assessing and improving human movements using sensitivity analysis and digital human simulation

A human-centric system combining smartwatch and LiDAR data to assess the risk of musculoskeletal disorders and improve ergonomics of Industry 5.0 manufacturing workers

Simulation analysis of low back forces in Snatch and Clean & Jerk movements via digital human modelling

Posture Monitoring and Correction Exercises for Workers in Hostile Environments Utilizing Non-Invasive Sensors: Algorithm Development and Validation

Study on Static Biomechanical Model of Whole Body Based on Virtual Human

Data-Driven Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Complex Hand-intensive Manufacturing Processes

An Ergonomics Analysis of Archers through Motion Tracking to Prevent Injuries and Improve Performance

An ergonomic evaluation using a deep learning approach for assessing postural risks in a virtual reality-based smart manufacturing context

Posture Risk Assessment in an Automotive Assembly Line Using Inertial Sensors

Development of a Platform to Assess the Risk of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Manual Load Handling Activities - Preliminary Results

Accuracy of Postures Predicted Using a Digital Human Model During Four Manual Exertion Tasks, and Implications for Ergonomic Assessments

Maintaining soldier musculoskeletal health using personalised digital humans, wearables and/or computer vision

Real-Time Posture Monitoring and Risk Assessment for Manual Lifting Tasks Using MediaPipe and LSTM

An Online Multi-Index Approach to Human Ergonomics Assessment in the Workplace

Closed-Chain Inverse Dynamics for the Biomechanical Analysis of Manual Material Handling Tasks through a Deep Learning Assisted Wearable Sensor Network