Plastic Burning Impacts on Atmospheric Fine Particulate Matter at Urban and Rural Sites in the USA and Bangladesh

Josie Welker,Abdus Salam,Elizabeth A. Stone,Md. Robiul Islam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00054
2022-06-09
ACS Environmental Au
Abstract:To better understand the impact of plastic burning on atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), we evaluated two methods for the quantification of 1,3,5-triphenylbenzene (TPB), a molecular tracer of plastic burning. Compared to traditional solvent-extraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) techniques, thermal-desorption (TD) GCMS provided higher throughput, lower limits of detection, more precise spike recoveries, a wider linear quantification range, and reduced solvent use. This method enabled quantification of TPB in fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) samples collected at rural and urban sites in the USA and Bangladesh. These analyses demonstrated a measurable impact of plastic burning at 5 of the 6 study locations, with the largest absolute and relative TPB concentrations occurring in Dhaka, Bangladesh, where plastic burning is expected to be a significant source of PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Background-level contributions of plastic burning in the USA were estimated to be 0.004-0.03 μg m<sup>-3</sup> of PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass. Across the four sites in the USA, the lower estimate of plastic burning contributions to PM<sub>2.5</sub> ranged 0.04-0.8%, while the median estimate ranged 0.3-3% (save for Atlanta, Georgia, in the wintertime at 2-7%). The results demonstrate a consistent presence of plastic burning emissions in ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> across urban and rural sites in the USA, with a relatively small impact in comparison to other anthropogenic combustion sources in most cases. Much higher TPB concentrations were observed in Dhaka, with estimated plastic burning impacts on PM<sub>2.5</sub> ranging from a lower estimate of 0.3-1.8 μg m<sup>-3</sup> (0.6-2% of PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and the median estimate ranging 2-35 μg m<sup>-3</sup> (5-15% of PM<sub>2.5</sub>). The methodological advances and new measurements presented herein help to assess the air quality impacts of burning plastic more broadly.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?