A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety between Combination Therapy and Monotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer (KCSG ST13-10)

Keun-Wook Lee,Dae Young Zang,Min-Hee Ryu,Hye-Suk Han,Ki Hyang Kim,Mi-Jung Kim,Sung Ae Koh,Sung Sook Lee,Dong- Hoe Koo,Yoon Ho Ko,Byeong Seok Sohn,Jin Won Kim,Jin Hyun Park,Byung Ho Nam,In Sil Choi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4267709
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Background: This study evaluated whether combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC) as first-line chemotherapy.Patients and methods: Elderly (≥70 years) chemo-naïve patients with MRGC were allocated to receive either combination therapy (group A: 5-FU/oxaliplatin, capecitabine/oxaliplatin, capecitabine/cisplatin, or S-1/cisplatin) or monotherapy (group B; 5-FU, capecitabine, or S-1). In group A, starting doses were 80% of standard doses, and they could be escalated to 100% at the discretion of the investigator. Primary endpoint was to confirm superior overall survival (OS) of combination therapy vs monotherapy.Results: After 111 of the planned 238 patients were randomized, enrollment was terminated due to poor accrual. In the full-analysis population [group A (n=53) and group B (n=51)], median OS of combination vs monotherapy was 11.5 vs 7.5 months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56–1.30; P=0.231]. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 vs 3.7 months (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34–0.83; P=0.005). In subgroup analyses, patients aged 70–74 years tended to have superior OS with combination therapy [15.9 vs 7.2 months (P=0.056)]. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred more frequently in group A vs group B. However, among severe TRAEs (≥grade 3), there were no TRAEs with a frequency difference of >5%.Conclusions: Combination therapy was associated with numerically improved OS, although statistically insignificant, and a significant PFS benefit compared with monotherapy. Although combination therapy showed more frequent TRAEs, there was no difference in the frequency of severe TRAEs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?