Phase Ii Study of Cetuximab in Combination with Modified Folfiri in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Who Failed First-Line Chemotherapy (effi Study)

J. Li,X. Liu,B. Y. Wang,W. J. Guo,J. L. Lin,X. D. Zhu,J. Zhang,T. Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.4107
IF: 45.3
2010-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:4107 Background: This multicenter, nonrandomized phase II study was launched to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with modified FOLFIRI as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer patients. Methods: Inclusion criteria were: 18-70 years, ECOG PS ≤ 1, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of stomach and failure to first-line therapy. C225 was given at an initial dose of 400 mg/m2, followed by weekly infusions of 250 mg/m2. On day 2 of each 14-day period, patients received CPT-11 at a dose of 180 mg/m2; CF at a dose of 200 mg/m2; and 5-Fu as a bolus of 400 mg/m2 and then 2,400 mg/m2 by continuous infusion for 46 hours. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. The study was carried out according to the Gehan's two- stage phase II trial design, the planned sample size was 55. The primary endpoint was TTP. Secondary endpoints included RR, OS and AEs. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled: 34 males (56%), 27 females (44%); median age was 52 years (range 26-69). 7 patients discontinued without tumor assessment within first cycle of treatment: 1 patient for obstructive jaundice, 3 patients for unacceptable grade 4 febrile neutropenia, 3 patients for intestinal obstruction, and 5 patients are too early to evaluate. 56 patients were evaluable for safety and 49 patients were evaluable for efficacy evaluation. The median TTP was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.9-5.9 months). Objective responses (RECIST) were: 1 (2.0%) CR, 16 (32.7%) PR, 17 (34.7%) CR + PR, 25 (51.0%) SD, 7 (14.3%) PD. The median OS was 8.1 months (95% CI: 7.2-9.0 months). Grade 3-4 toxicity (CTC v3.0) was 62.5% neutropenia (12.5% febrile neutropenia), 26.8% anemia, 5.4% thrombocytopenia, 8.9% asthenia, 5.4% vomiting, 3.6% diarrhea, 3.6 % fatigue, 1.8% elevated transaminase and 1.8% allergic reaction. Skin reactions ≥ 2 was observed in 42.9%. Conclusions: The combination of cetuximab and FOLFIRI was well-tolerated and appears to be active (85.7% of disease control rate) as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer patients. Further analysis of this study will allow more detailed assessment of this combination treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?