THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COACHING FOR THE SAT: REVIEW AND REANALYSIS OF RESEARCH FROM THE FIFTIES TO THE FTC
Samuel Messick,Donald L. Alderman,William Angoff,Ann Jungeblut,Donald E. Powers,Donald Rock,Donald B. Rubin,T.W.F. Stroud
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1980.tb01198.x
1980-01-01
ETS Research Report Series
Abstract:ETS Research Report SeriesVolume 1980, Issue 1 p. ii-iii ArticleFree Access THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COACHING FOR THE SAT: REVIEW AND REANALYSIS OF RESEARCH FROM THE FIFTIES TO THE FTC Samuel Messick, Samuel Messick Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorDonald L. Alderman, Donald L. Alderman Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorWilliam Angoff, William Angoff Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorAnn Jungeblut, Ann Jungeblut Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorDonald E. Powers, Donald E. Powers Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorDonald Rock, Donald Rock Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorDonald B. Rubin, Donald B. Rubin Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorT.W.F. Stroud, T.W.F. Stroud Queens University • Kingston, OntarioSearch for more papers by this author Samuel Messick, Samuel Messick Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorDonald L. Alderman, Donald L. Alderman Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorWilliam Angoff, William Angoff Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorAnn Jungeblut, Ann Jungeblut Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorDonald E. Powers, Donald E. Powers Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorDonald Rock, Donald Rock Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorDonald B. Rubin, Donald B. Rubin Educational Testing Service •Princeton, NJSearch for more papers by this authorT.W.F. Stroud, T.W.F. Stroud Queens University • Kingston, OntarioSearch for more papers by this author First published: June 1980 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1980.tb01198.xCitations: 3AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Alderman, D. L., & Powers, D. E. The effects of special preparation on SAT-verbal scores (CB RDR 78–79, No. 4 and RR 79–1). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1979. [American Educational Research Journal, 1980, 17, 239– 251.). Belson, W. A. A technique for studying the effects of a television broadcast. Applied Statistics, 1956, 5, 195– 202. Breland, H. M. Population validity and college entrance measures (Research Monograph No. 8). New York: The College Board, 1979. Bryk, A. S., & Weisberg, H. I. Value-added analysis: A dynamic approach to the estimation of treatment effects. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1976, 1, 127– 155. Bryk, A. S., & Weisberg, H. I. Use of the nonequivalent control group design when subjects are growing. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 950– 962. Campbell, D. T. Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 409– 429. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963. Cochran, W. G. The use of covariance in observational studies. Applied Statistics, 1968, 17, 270– 275. Coffman, W. E., & Parry, M. E. Effects of an accelerated reading course on SAT-V scores. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1967, 46, 292– 296. Dear, R. E. The effect of a program of intensive coaching on SAT scores (ETS RB 58–5). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1958. (Reported in French, J. W., & Dear, R. E. Effect of coaching on an aptitude test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1959, 19, 319– 330.). Dixon, W. J., & Massey, F. J., Jr. Introduction to statistical analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951. Donlon, T. F. The effects of special preparation for tests: The ETS experience. Paper in preparation. Dyer, H. S. Does coaching help? College Board Review, 1953, 19, 331–335. (Reported in, French, J. W., & Dear, R. E. Effect of coaching on an aptitude test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1959, 19, 319– 330.). Evans, F. R., & Pike, L. W. The effects of instruction for three mathematics item formats. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973, 10, 257– 272. Federal Trade Commission, Boston Regional Office. Staff memorandum of the Boston Regional Office of the Federal Trade Commission: The effects of coaching on standardized admission examinations. Boston, Mass.: Federal Trade Commission, Boston Regional Office, September 1978. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection. Effects of coaching on standardized admission examinations: Revised statistical analyses of data gathered by Boston Regional Office of the Federal Trade Commission. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection, March 1979. Frankel, E. Effects of growth, practice, and coaching on Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1960, 38, 713– 719. French, J. W. The coachability of the SAT in public schools (RB 55–26). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1955. French, J. W., & Dear, R. E. Effect of coaching on an aptitude test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1959, 19, 319– 330. Lass, A. H. Unpublished study. Brooklyn, NY: Abraham Lincoln High School, 1958. Marron, J. E. Preparatory school test preparation: Special test preparation, its effect on College Board scores and the relationship of affected scores to subsequent college performance. West Point, NY: Research Division, Office of the Director of Admissions and Registrar, United States Military Academy, 1965. Pallone, N. J. Effects of short-term and long-term developmental reading courses upon S.A.T. verbal scores. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1961, 39, 654– 657. Pike, L. W. Short-term instruction, testwiseness, and the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A literature review with research recommendations (CB RDR 77– 78, No. 2 and ETS RB 78–2). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1978. Pike, L. W. Implicit guessing strategies of GRE-aptitude examinees classified by ethnic group and sex (GRE Board Professional Report GREB No. 75– 10P). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1980. Pike, L. W., & Evans, F. R. The effects of special instruction fox three kinds of mathematics aptitude items (CB RDR 71– 72, No. 7 and ETS RB 72–19.) Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1972. Powers, D. E., & Alderman, D. L. The use, acceptance, and impact of Taking the SAT—A test familiarization booklet (CB RDR 78– 79, No. 6 and ETS RR 79–3). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1979. Roberts, S. O., & Oppenheim, D. B. The effect of special instruction upon test performance of high school students in Tennessee (CB RDR 66– 7, No. 1 and ETS RB 66–36). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1966. Rock, D. A., & Werts, C. E. Construct validity of the SAT across populations—An empirical confirmatory study (CB RDR 78– 79, No. 5 and RR 79–2). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1979. Slack, W. V., & Porter, D. The Scholastic Aptitude Test: A critical appraisal. Harvard Educational Review, 1980, 50, 154– 175. Stern, J. Personal communication, 1975. Vernon, P. E. The determinants of reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1962, 22, 269– 286. Whitla, D. K. Effect of tutoring on Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1962, 41, 32– 37. Alderman, D. L., & Powers, D. E. The effects of special preparation on SAT-Verbal scores. Research Report 79-1. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1979. Brownlee, K. A. Statistical theory and methodology, 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 1965. Cochran, W. G., & Rubin, D. B. Controlling bias in observational studies: A review. Sankhya A, 1973, 35(4), 417– 446. Federal Trade Commission, Boston Office, 1978. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 1979. Rubin, D. B. Characterizing the estimation of parameters in incomplete-data problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1974, 69, 467– 474. Rubin, D. B. Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 1976, 63(3), 581– 592. Rubin, D. B. Estimation in parallel randomized experiments. Research Bulletin. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1979. Wirtz, W. & Associates. On further examination. New York: College Board, 1977. Bryk, A. S., & Weisberg. H. I. Use of the nonequivalent control group design when subjects are growing. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 950– 962. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963. Campbell, D. T. Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 409– 429. Federal Trade Commission, Boston Regional Office, Staff memorandom of the Boston Regional Office of the Federal Trade Commission: The effects of coaching on standardized admission examinations. Boston, Mass.: Federal Trade Commission, Boston Regional Office, September 1978. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection. Effects of coaching on standardized admission examinations: Revised statistical analyses of data gathered by Boston Regional Office of the Federal Trade Commission. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection, March 1979. Kenny, D. A. A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 1975, 82, 345– 362. Citing Literature Volume1980, Issue1June 1980Pages ii-iii ReferencesRelatedInformation