Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the California Arithmetic Test when used with children identified as having specific learning disabilities. The samples consisted of children in grades one through three enrolled in a diagnostic, prescriptive, remedial Resource Roos program for children with specific learning disabilities. These children were from three of the eight schools housing the program. Both tests were administered in late September and early October and again in May. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were computed for each pair of variables, as were 95% confidence intervals. The validity coefficients and the lover limits of the 95% confidence intervals were significant at least at the 0.05 level. The results suggest that there is a significant positive relationship between the Keydath and the California tests for the learning disabled population under study. (Author/SD) The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test: Use with Learning Disabled Students Abstract Tho purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMith Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the Cali-Tho purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMith Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the California Arithmetic Test when used with children identified as having specific learning disabilities. The samples consisted of children in grades one through three enrolled in a diagnostic/prescriptive/ remedial Resource Room program for children with specific learning disabilities. These children were from three of the eight schools housing the program. Both tests were administered in late September and early October 1972 and again in May 1973. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were computed for each pair of variables, as were 95% confidence intervals. The validity coefficients and the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals were significant at least at the 0.05 level. The results suggest that there is a significant positive relationship between the KeyMath and the California for the learning disabled population under study. Various authors (Gronlund, 1971; Johnson and Myklebust, 1967; Jones, 1973; Lerner, 1971; Reisman, 1972) agree that diagnosis and evaluation should he available to students and should be used in planning an educational program for each individual. Included in the diagnosis should be both assessment of how the child learns (learning modalities, learning styles) and how much he has achieved in each of the academic areas. Evaluation should be continual so that program plans may be changed as necessary toward achieving whatever educational goals have been set. There is much writing to be found in learning disabilities literature that focuses on perceptual development, language development, and reading, but relatively little available on arithmetic disabilities and their diagnosis. The California Arithmetic Test (CAT) (Tiegs & Clark, 1963) has been widely used as an achievement measure. An advantage of this test has been the "Diagnostic Analysis of Learning Difficulties" which catagorizes the items and thus provides a g.oss approximation of strengths and weaknesses. This and other standardized measures provide questionable results when administered to children in special education programs if normative data on such groups have not been established. Even when data is available on samples of handicapped children, the lack of national agreement on definitive identifiable characteristics and the inconsistency in labeling of groups such as emotionally disturbed, brain injured, learning disabled, dyslexic, etc. make generalization of test data dubious. Although use of criterionreferenced rather than norm-referenced tests has been proposed (Prager & Mann, 1973), the need for norm-referenced data to determine large scale program accountability in the public schools makes the rejection of norm-referenced measures unlikely. There is need for instruments that provide maximum achievement and diagnostic data and that can be administered by regular school personnel with a minimum of training. The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test (Connolly, Natchman, & Pritchett, 1971) offers an alternative to the CAT.

Assessing the Comparability of School Scores Across Test Forms That Are Not Parallel

Assessing the interchangeability of linked scores in multivariable statistical analyses

Test Fairness: Examining Differential Functioning of the Reading Comprehension Section of the GSEEE in China

Establishing Comparability Across Writing Tasks With Picture Prompts of Three Alternate Tests

The stability of kindergarten teachers’ effectiveness: A generalizability study comparing the Framework For Teaching and the Classroom Assessment Scoring System

Inter-school variations in the standard of examiners' graduation-level OSCE judgements

Measuring the Appropriateness of Multiple-Choice Test Scores

Fairness and Comparability in Achievement Motivation Items: A Differential Item Functioning Analysis

The use of test scores from large-scale assessment surveys: psychometric and statistical considerations

The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test: Use with Learning Disabled Students

Comparing standard deviation effects across contexts

Harmonizing the CBCL and SDQ ADHD scores by using linear equating, kernel equating, item response theory and machine learning methods

Comparing Yes/No Angoff and Bookmark Standard Setting Methods in the Context of English Assessment

Aggregating Student Achievement Trends Across States With Different Tests: Using Standardized Slopes as Effect Sizes

Should we adjust for pupil background in school value-added models? A study of Progress 8 and school accountability in England

The Spearman-Brown Formula and Reliabilities of Random Test Forms

Incomplete psychometric equivalence of scores obtained on the manual and the computer version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test?

An Examination of the Predictive Validity of the Keymath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the Wide Range Achievement Test in Exceptional Children.

Using Burke's Dramatistic Pentad to Interpret Chinese "Gao-Kao" High Stakes Testing and Stressing - Paralelled Testing in the U.S. As Cross-Cultural Context

Ability self-concept formation in elementary school: No dimensional comparison effects across time.

Higher-Order Asymptotics and Its Application to Testing the Equality of the Examinee Ability Over Two Sets of Items