Xiaoke Li,Wenbo Xing,Qianlong Jiang,Zhenzhong Chen,Wenbo Zhao,Yapeng Xu,Yang Cao,Wuyi Ming,Jun Ma
Abstract:The axle bridge plays a crucial role in the bogie of low-floor light rail vehicles, impacting operational efficiency and fuel economy. To minimize the total cost of the structure and turning of axle bridges, an optimization model of structural and turning parameters was built, with the fatigue life, maximum stress, maximum deformation, and maximum main cutting force as constraints. Through orthogonal experiments and multivariate variance analysis, the key design variables which have a significant impact on optimization objectives and constraints (performance responses) were identified. Then the optimal Latin hypercube design and finite element simulation was used to build a Radial Basis Function (RBF) model to approximate the implicit relationship between design variables and performance responses. Finally, a multi-island genetic algorithm was applied to solve the integrated optimization model, resulting in an 8.457% and 1.1% reduction in total cost compared with the original parameters and parameters of sequential optimization, proving the effectiveness of the proposed method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the issue of optimizing the axle bridge structure and machining parameters of low-floor light rail vehicles to reduce the total cost. Specifically, the goal of the paper is to minimize the total cost of structure and machining by optimizing the structural parameters of the axle bridge (such as journal diameter, spring seat thickness, etc.) and machining parameters (such as cutting speed, feed rate, etc.), while satisfying constraints such as fatigue life, maximum stress, maximum deformation, and maximum main cutting force.
### Main Issues
1. **Structural Optimization**:
- Optimize the structural parameters of the axle bridge, including journal diameters (d1, d2, d3) and spring seat thickness (t), to reduce material costs.
- Constraints include maximum stress, maximum deformation, and fatigue life.
2. **Machining Parameter Optimization**:
- Optimize the machining parameters of the axle bridge, such as cutting speed and feed rate, to improve machining accuracy, production efficiency, and reduce costs.
- Constraints include cutting force.
### Solution Methods
1. **Establish Optimization Models**:
- Structural optimization model: Use the structural parameters of the axle bridge as design variables, cost as the objective function, and fatigue life, maximum stress, and maximum deformation as constraints.
- Machining parameter optimization model: Use machining parameters as design variables, machining cost as the objective function, and cutting force as a constraint.
2. **Orthogonal Experiment and Multivariate Analysis of Variance**:
- Identify key design variables that significantly impact the optimization objectives and constraints through orthogonal experiments and multivariate analysis of variance.
3. **RBF Model**:
- Use optimal Latin hypercube design and finite element simulation to establish a radial basis function (RBF) model, approximating the implicit relationship between design variables and performance responses.
4. **Multi-Island Genetic Algorithm**:
- Apply a multi-island genetic algorithm to solve the integrated optimization model and obtain the optimal combination of axle bridge structure and machining parameters.
### Experimental Results
- The optimized axle bridge structural parameters are: d1=110.04 mm, d2=123.29 mm, d3=151.71 mm, t=50.921 mm.
- The maximum stress is 313.408 MPa, the maximum deformation is 6.395 × 10^-3 mm, and the minimum life is 1.029 × 10^9 cycles.
- Under the constraint conditions, the optimized axle bridge weight is reduced by 37.836 kg, with a weight reduction rate of 8.05%, and material cost is reduced by 47.56 USD.
- The total cost is reduced by 8.457% and 1.1% compared to the original parameters and sequential optimization parameters, respectively.
### Innovations
- The integrated optimization model combines the optimization of structural parameters and machining parameters, avoiding the issue of separating structure and machining design in traditional sequential optimization methods, thereby more effectively reducing the total cost.