Abstract:figure legend Summary of the complementary dominance hypothesis of motor lateralization and its application in remediating functional motor deficits of the ipsilesional arm in stroke survivors. The complementary dominance model of motor lateralization highlights distinct yet complementary functional contributions of each hemisphere to movement control (top panel). The dominant (left) hemisphere specializes in optimal control of limb dynamics and is therefore advantaged for well‐established behavioural patterns under predictable circumstances. The non‐dominant (right) hemisphere specializes in impedance control, which regulates steady‐state limb position and responses to unexpected stimuli in the environment. Unilateral stroke results in hemisphere‐specific motor deficits in both the contralesional and ipsilesional arms that are functionally limiting and consistent with the complementary dominance hypothesis. Left hemisphere stroke leads to deficits in initial direction accuracy, resulting in curved hand trajectories (middle panel, right). By contrast, right hemisphere stroke impairs final position accuracy, as demonstrated by larger deviations from the target location (middle panel, left). Based on these observations, we are now testing a novel training intervention to remediate functional motor deficits of the ipsilesional arm for chronic, severely impaired stroke survivors. The intervention includes hemisphere‐specific virtual‐reality training (bottom panel, top row) and real‐world dexterity training (bottom panel, lower row), which we expect to translate to improved functional independence. The complementary dominance hypothesis is a novel model of motor lateralization substantiated by decades of research examining interlimb differences in the control of upper extremity movements in neurotypical adults and hemisphere‐specific motor deficits in stroke survivors. In contrast to earlier ideas that attribute handedness to the specialization of one hemisphere, our model proposes complementary motor control specializations in each hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere mediates optimal control of limb dynamics as required for smooth and efficient movements, whereas the non‐dominant hemisphere mediates impedance control, important for countering unexpected mechanical conditions and achieving steady‐state limb positions. Importantly, this model proposes that each hemisphere contributes its specialization to both arms (though with greater influence from either arm's contralateral hemisphere) and thus predicts that lesions to one hemisphere should produce hemisphere‐specific motor deficits in not only the contralesional arm, but also the ipsilesional arm of stroke survivors – a powerful prediction now supported by a growing body of evidence. Such ipsilesional arm motor deficits vary with contralesional arm impairment, and thus individuals with little to no functional use of the contralesional arm experience both the greatest impairments in the ipsilesional arm, as well as the greatest reliance on it to serve as the main or sole manipulator for activities of daily living. Accordingly, we have proposed and tested a novel intervention that reduces hemisphere‐specific ipsilesional arm deficits and thereby improves functional independence in stroke survivors with severe contralesional impairment.

Oromotor Nonverbal Performance and Speech Motor Control: Theory and Review of Empirical Evidence

Exploring Motor Speech Disorders in Low and Minimally Verbal Autistic Individuals: An Auditory-Perceptual Analysis

Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatment Issues Related to Children With Developmental Speech Sound Disorders

The Role of Gesture in Communication and Cognition: Implications for Understanding and Treating Neurogenic Communication Disorders

Sensorimotor Integration in Patients with Voice Disorders: A Scoping Review of Behavioral Research

Time Processing and Motor Control in Movement Disorders

Partially Overlapping Sensorimotor Networks Underlie Speech Praxis and Verbal Short-Term Memory: Evidence from Apraxia of Speech Following Acute Stroke.

Neurophysiology of unimanual motor control and mirror movements

Evaluating the Influence of Motor Control on Selective Attention through a Stochastic Model: The Paradigm of Motor Control Dysfunction in Cerebellar Patient

Functional Roles of Sensorimotor Alpha and Beta Oscillations in Overt Speech Production

Motor Control: A Conceptual Framework for Rehabilitation

Interpersonal motor resonance in autism spectrum disorder: evidence against a global “mirror system” deficit

Premotor Function in Interpersonal Bimanual Coordination: Neural Responses to Varying Frequencies and Spatio-Temporal Relationships

Analyzing Speech Motor Movement using Surface Electromyography in Minimally Verbal Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Oral Diadochokinetic markers of X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism

Interaction between auditory and motor systems in speech perception

Motor Control in Parkinson's Disease During the Performance of Multi-Joint Reversal Movements

Motor programming in apraxia of speech

Written discourse in diagnosis for acquired neurogenic communication disorders: current evidence and future directions

The complementary dominance hypothesis: a model for remediating the 'good' hand in stroke survivors

Isolation of Distinct Networks Driving Action and Cognition in Psychomotor Processes