Abstract:Radiomics is a method to extract detailed information from diagnostic images that cannot be perceived by the naked eye. Although radiomics research carries great potential to improve clinical decision-making, its inherent methodological complexities make it difficult to comprehend every step of the analysis, often causing reproducibility and generalizability issues that hinder clinical adoption. Critical steps in the radiomics analysis and model development pipeline-such as image, application of image filters, and selection of feature extraction parameters-can greatly affect the values of radiomic features. Moreover, common errors in data partitioning, model comparison, fine-tuning, assessment, and calibration can reduce reproducibility and impede clinical translation. Clinical adoption of radiomics also requires a deep understanding of model explainability and the development of intuitive interpretations of radiomic features. To address these challenges, it is essential for radiomics model developers and clinicians to be well-versed in current best practices. Proper knowledge and application of these practices is crucial for accurate radiomics feature extraction, robust model development, and thorough assessment, ultimately increasing reproducibility, generalizability, and the likelihood of successful clinical translation. In this article, we have provided researchers with our recommendations along with practical examples to facilitate good research practices in radiomics. KEY POINTS: Radiomics' inherent methodological complexity should be understood to ensure rigorous radiomic model development to improve clinical decision-making. Adherence to radiomics-specific checklists and quality assessment tools ensures methodological rigor. Use of standardized radiomics tools and best practices enhances clinical translation of radiomics models.

CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII

CLEAR guideline for radiomics: Early insights into current reporting practices endorsed by EuSoMII

Evaluation of the reliability and usability of CARE‐Radiology: A descriptive‐analytic study

Reporting checklists in neuroimaging: promoting transparency, replicability, and reproducibility

ESR Essentials: radiomics-practice recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics

Self-reported checklists and quality scoring tools in radiomics: a meta-research

CARE-radiology statement explanation and elaboration: reporting guideline for radiological case reports

Decoding Radiomics: A Step-by-Step Guide to Machine Learning Workflow in Hand-Crafted and Deep Learning Radiomics Studies

Radiomics for clinical decision support in radiation oncology

Criteria for the translation of radiomics into clinically useful tests

Radiomics in medical imaging—“how-to” guide and critical reflection

Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analysis

Updating the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) for reporting AI research

The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Convolutional Filters for Reproducible Radiomics and Enhanced Clinical Insights

Advancements in Standardizing Radiological Reports: A Comprehensive Review

Introduction to radiomics for a clinical audience

Protocol for Developing the Reporting Guidelines for Radiological Case Reports: Case Report for Radiology Statement

METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII

A deep look into radiomics

Enhancing the Clinical Utility of Radiomics: Addressing the Challenges of Repeatability and Reproducibility in CT and MRI

A review in radiomics: Making personalized medicine a reality via routine imaging