Abstract:Abstract Objectives Radiomics is the extraction of quantitative data from medical imaging, which has the potential to characterise tumour phenotype. The radiomics approach has the capacity to construct predictive models for treatment response, essential for the pursuit of personalised medicine. In this literature review, we summarise the current status and evaluate the scientific and reporting quality of radiomics research in the prediction of treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database. A total of 178 articles were screened for eligibility and 14 peer-reviewed articles were included. The radiomics quality score (RQS), a radiomics-specific quality metric emulating the TRIPOD guidelines, was used to assess scientific and reporting quality. Results Included studies reported several predictive markers including first-, second- and high-order features, such as kurtosis, grey-level uniformity and wavelet HLL mean respectively, as well as PET-based metabolic parameters. Quality assessment demonstrated a low median score of + 2.5 (range − 5 to + 9), mainly reflecting a lack of reproducibility and clinical evaluation. There was extensive heterogeneity between studies due to differences in patient population, cancer stage, treatment modality, follow-up timescales and radiomics workflow methodology. Conclusions Radiomics research has not yet been translated into clinical use. Efforts towards standardisation and collaboration are needed to identify reproducible radiomic predictors of response. Promising radiomic models must be externally validated and their impact evaluated within the clinical pathway before they can be implemented as a clinical decision-making tool to facilitate personalised treatment for patients with NSCLC. Key Points • The included studies reported several promising radiomic markers of treatment response in lung cancer; however, there was a lack of reproducibility between studies. • Quality assessment using the radiomics quality score (RQS) demonstrated a low median total score of + 2.5 (range − 5 to + 9). • Future radiomics research should focus on implementation of standardised radiomics features and software, together with external validation in a prospective setting.

Radiomics for clinical decision support in radiation oncology

A review in radiomics: Making personalized medicine a reality via routine imaging

Clinical applications of radiomics and deep learning in breast and lung cancer: A narrative literature review on current evidence and future perspectives

Introduction to radiomics for a clinical audience

Systematic Review on the Association of Radiomics with Tumor Biological Endpoints

Radiomics: the facts and the challenges of image analysis

Radiomics as a personalized medicine tool in lung cancer: Separating the hope from the hype

Clinical application of radiomics for the prediction of treatment outcome and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review

The Main Findings, Challenges and Limitations of the Methodologies

Radiomics in predicting treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer: current status, challenges and future perspectives

Radiomics in Oncology, Part 1: Technical Principles and Gastrointestinal Application in CT and MRI

A deep look into radiomics

Radiomics in Oncology, Part 2: Thoracic, Genito-Urinary, Breast, Neurological, Hematologic and Musculoskeletal Applications

How Radiomics Can Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Radiomics in Oncology: A Practical Guide

Radiomics in medical imaging: pitfalls and challenges in clinical management

Radiomics: an Overview in Lung Cancer Management—a Narrative Review

Oncologic Imaging and Radiomics: A Walkthrough Review of Methodological Challenges

Promises and challenges for the implementation of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in oncology

Radiomics in radiation oncology—basics, methods, and limitations

Radiomics: from qualitative to quantitative imaging