Comparison of Minced Cartilage Implantation with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation in an In Vitro Inflammation Model

Robert Ossendorff,Lisa Grede,Sebastian Scheidt,Andreas C. Strauss,Christof Burger,Dieter C. Wirtz,Gian M. Salzmann,Frank A. Schildberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13060546
IF: 6
2024-03-20
Cells
Abstract:The current gold standard to treat large cartilage defects is autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT). As a new surgical method of cartilage regeneration, minced cartilage implantation (MCI) is increasingly coming into focus. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of chondrogenesis between isolated and cultured chondrocytes compared to cartilage chips in a standardized inflammation model with the proinflammatory cytokine TNFα. Articular chondrocytes from bovine cartilage were cultured according to the ACT method to passage 3 and transferred to spheroid culture. At the same time, cartilage was fragmented (<1 mm3) to produce cartilage chips. TNFα (20 ng/mL) was supplemented to simulate an inflammatory process. TNFα had a stronger influence on the passaged chondrocytes compared to the non-passaged ones, affecting gene expression profiles differently between isolated chondrocytes and cartilage chips. MCI showed less susceptibility to TNFα, with reduced IL-6 release and less impact on inflammation markers. Biochemical and histological analyses supported these findings, showing a greater negative influence of TNFα on the passaged pellet cultures compared to the unpassaged cells and MCI constructs. This study demonstrated the negative influence of TNFα on chondrogenesis in a chondrocyte spheroid culture and cartilage fragment model. Passaged chondrocytes are more sensitive to cytokine influences compared to non-passaged cells and chondrons. This suggests that MCI may have superior regeneration potential in osteoarthritic conditions compared to ACT. Further investigations are necessary for the translation of these findings into clinical practice.
cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the comparison of the cartilage regeneration ability between autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) and minced cartilage implantation (MCI) under inflammatory conditions. Specifically, the study aims to simulate the inflammatory environment by supplementing the pro - inflammatory cytokine TNF - α, so as to evaluate the impact of these two techniques on transplantation maturation under inflammatory conditions. In addition, the study also analyzes the impact of in vitro cell expansion as a core part of the ACT procedure by comparing the effects of primary non - passaged chondrocytes (P0) and chondrocytes passaged to the third generation (P3). ### Research Background - **Cartilage Injury**: Articular cartilage has limited self - repair ability, and untreated cartilage injuries increase the risk of developing osteoarthritis. - **Existing Treatment Methods**: Autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) is the gold - standard method for treating large "traumatic" cartilage defects. However, ACT has a certain complication rate, and long - term follow - up shows that its revision rate is as high as 30%. - **New Method**: Minced cartilage implantation (MCI), as a new surgical method, is gradually attracting attention. MCI is a single - operation process. By chopping the cartilage into small fragments (<1 mm³) and then re - implanting it together with autologous platelet - rich plasma, fibrin glue or membrane, it activates the migration, proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes to form a new tissue similar to hyaline. ### Research Objectives 1. **Compare the Impact of Inflammation on Transplant Maturation**: By supplementing the pro - inflammatory cytokine TNF - α, compare the effects of MCI and ACT (spheroid technology) on transplantation maturation under inflammatory conditions. 2. **Analyze the Impact of In Vitro Cell Expansion**: By comparing primary non - passaged chondrocytes (P0) and chondrocytes passaged to the third generation (P3), analyze the impact of in vitro cell expansion on the ACT procedure. ### Research Methods - **Experimental Design**: Extract articular cartilage from bovine tarsal joints, cut it into small fragments less than 1 mm³, and isolate articular chondrocytes at the same time. - **Cell Culture**: The P0 group is directly transferred to spheroid culture, the P3 group is transferred to spheroid culture after 5 - 8 passages, and the MCI group is cut into fragments less than 1 mm³. - **Inflammatory Model**: Simulate the inflammatory environment by supplementing 20 ng/mL TNF - α for 14 days. - **Analysis Methods**: Including RT - PCR, biochemical analysis and histological evaluation. ### Main Findings - **Gene Expression**: TNF - α significantly reduces type II collagen gene expression in P3 spheroid constructs, while P0 and MCI samples are not affected. - **Biochemical Analysis**: TNF - α significantly reduces glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis in P0 spheroids, while MCI constructs are not affected. - **Histological Analysis**: Safranin O and Fast Green staining show that a large amount of proteoglycan is lost in P0 constructs after TNF - α treatment, while MCI constructs maintain a typical hyaline cartilage structure with a high amount of proteoglycan. ### Conclusions - **Advantages of MCI under Inflammatory Conditions**: MCI shows lower IL - 6 release and less impact on inflammatory markers under inflammatory conditions, indicating that it may have better regeneration potential in the osteoarthritis environment. - **Limitations of ACT**: Passaged chondrocytes (P3) are more sensitive to cytokine effects, which may limit the application of ACT in the inflammatory environment. ### Prospects Future research needs to further verify these findings and explore how to apply these results to clinical practice.