Abstract:The SARS-CoV-2 viruses and their triggered COVID-19 pandemic have fundamentally reshaped the world in almost every aspect, their evolution and influences remain. While over a million of literature have been produced on these unprecedented, overwhelming global disaster, one critical question is open: How has COVID-19 been quantified globally? This further inspires many other questions: What COVID-19 problems have been modeled? How have modeling methods in areas such as epidemiology, artificial intelligence (AI), data science, machine learning, deep learning, mathematics and social science played their roles in characterizing COVID-19? Where are the gaps and issues of these COVID-19 modeling studies? What are the lessons for quantifying future disasters? Answering these questions involves the analysis of a very broad spectrum of literature across different disciplines and domains. Distinguishing from specific efforts, this review takes the first attempt to generate a systematic, structured and contrastive landscape and taxonomy of global COVID-19 modeling. First, the surveyed problems span over a full range of COVID-19, including epidemic transmission processes, case identification and tracing, infection diagnosis and medical treatments, non-pharmaceutical interventions and their influence, drug and vaccine development, psychological, economic and social influence and impact, and misinformation, and so on. Second, the reviewed modeling methods traverse all relevant disciplines, from statistic modeling to epidemic modeling, medical analysis, biomedical analysis, AI, deep and machine learning, analytics, and simulation. Critical analyses further identify significant issues and gaps, for example, simple techniques and similar problems have been overwhelmingly addressed everywhere, while intrinsic and foundational issues and deep insights have been overlooked. The review discloses significant opportunities for more deeply, effectively and uniquely quantifying COVID-19-like global disasters from their intrinsic working mechanisms, interactions and dynamics.

Reproducibility of COVID-era infectious disease models

Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas: There is a reproducibility crisis in COVID-19 Computational Fluid Dynamics studies

Gauging the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Modeling in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

The reproducibility of COVID-19 data analysis: paradoxes, pitfalls, and future challenges

COVID-19 mitigation strategies and overview on results from relevant studies in Europe

How have mathematical models contributed to understanding the transmission and control of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare settings? A systematic search and review

MODELS: a six-step framework for developing an infectious disease model

A computational reproducibility study of PLOS ONE articles featuring longitudinal data analyses

COVID-19 Modeling: A Review

The Use and Misuse of Mathematical Modeling for Infectious Disease Policymaking: Lessons for the COVID-19 Pandemic

Analytical tool for COVID-19 using an SIR model equivalent to the chain reaction equation of infection

Reproducible Research Using Biomodels

Better Modelling of Infectious Diseases: Lessons from Covid-19 in China

COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan Demonstrates the Limitations of Publicly Available Case Numbers for Epidemiological Modeling

Analysis of SEIR-type models used at the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic reported in high-impact journals

Computational Simulation Is a Vital Resource for Navigating the COVID-19 Pandemic

Practical resources for enhancing the reproducibility of mechanistic modeling in systems biology

Reverse Engineering the Reproduction Number: A Framework for Data-Driven Counterfactual Analysis, Strategy Evaluation, and Feedback Control of Epidemics

Quantitative clarification of key questions about COVID-19 epidemiology

Structural Identifiability and Observability of Compartmental Models of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Call for transparency of COVID-19 models