Opportunities for improving data sharing and FAIR data practices to advance global mental health–Corrigendum

Yaara Sadeh,Anna Denejkina,Eirini Karyotaki,Lonneke I. M. Lenferink,Nancy Kassam-Adams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.14

2023-04-24

Global Mental Health

Abstract://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS2054425123000146/resource/name/firstPage-S2054425123000146a.jpg

psychiatry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Corrigendum to "An early economic evaluation of Kooth, a web-based mental health platform for children and young people with emerging mental health needs" [Internet Interv. 36 (2024) 100748 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100748 (Published online 2024 May 11)]

Laura Coote,Laura Kelly,Charlotte Graham,Luc Curtis-Gretton,Maisie Green,Louisa Salhi,Santiago de Ossorno Garcia,Aaron Sefi,Hayden Holmes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2024.100756

2024-07-04

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100748.].
Erratum: Sociome Data Commons: A scalable and sustainable platform for investigating the full social context and determinants of health - ERRATUM

Sandra Tilmon,Sharmilee Nyenhuis,Anthony Solomonides,Bruno Barbarioli,Ankur Bhargava,Suzi Birz,Kathryn Bouzein,Celine Cardenas,Bradley Carlson,Ellen Cohen,Emily Dillon,Brian Furner,Zhong Huang,Julie Johnson,Nivedha Krishnan,Kevin Lazenby,Kaitlyn Li,Sonya Makhni,Doriane Miller,Jonathan Ozik,Carlos Santos,Marc Sleiman,Julian Solway,Sanjay Krishnan,Samuel Volchenbouma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.537

2024-05-13

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.670.].
Erratum: Toward standardization, harmonization, and integration of social determinants of health data: A Texas Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions collaboration - CORRIGENDUM

Catherine K Craven,Linda Highfield,Mujeeb Basit,Elmer V Bernstam,Byeong Yeob Choi,Robert L Ferrer,Jonathan A Gelfond,Sandi L Pruitt,Vaishnavi Kannan,Paula K Shireman,Heidi Spratt,Kayla J Torres Morales,Chen-Pin Wang,Zhan Wang,Meredith N Zozus,Edward C Sankary,Susanne Schmidt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.516

2024-04-18

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.2.].
Addendum: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

Mark D. Wilkinson,Michel Dumontier,Ijsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,Gabrielle Appleton,Myles Axton,Arie Baak,Niklas Blomberg,Jan-Willem Boiten,Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos,Philip E. Bourne,Jildau Bouwman,Anthony J. Brookes,Tim Clark,Mercè Crosas,Ingrid Dillo,Olivier Dumon,Scott Edmunds,Chris T. Evelo,Richard Finkers,Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran,Alasdair J. G. Gray,Paul Groth,Carole Goble,Jeffrey S. Grethe,Jaap Heringa,Peter A. C. ’t Hoen,Rob Hooft,Tobias Kuhn,Ruben Kok,Joost Kok,Scott J. Lusher,Maryann E. Martone,Albert Mons,Abel L. Packer,Bengt Persson,Philippe Rocca-Serra,Marco Roos,Rene van Schaik,Susanna-Assunta Sansone,Erik Schultes,Thierry Sengstag,Ted Slater,George Strawn,Morris A. Swertz,Mark Thompson,Johan van der Lei,Erik van Mulligen,Jan Velterop,Andra Waagmeester,Peter Wittenburg,Katherine Wolstencroft,Jun Zhao,Barend Mons

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0009-6

2019-03-19

Scientific Data

Abstract:Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.A Nature Research Journal Addendum | <abbr>Open</abbr> | <a href="#article-info">Published: <time>19 March 2019</time></a>Scientific Datavolume 6, Article number: 6 (2019) | <a href="/articles/s41597-019-0009-6.ris"> Download Citation </a>Addendum to: Scientific Data <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18</a>, published online 15 March 2016Since publication, the URL at which the FAIR principles 'living document' is hosted and maintained has changed from <a href="http://datafairport.org/fair-principles-living-document-menu">http://datafairport.org/fair-principles-living-document-menu</a> to <a href="https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/">https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/</a>.Correspondence to <a href="/articles/s41597-019-0009-6/email/correspondent/c1/new">Barend Mons</a>.Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a>.<time>19 March 2019</time><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0009-6">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0009-6</a><a href="/search/advanced">Advanced search</a><abbr>ISSN</abbr> (online)© 2019 Springer Nature Publishing AG

multidisciplinary sciences
Erratum: Artificial intelligence based data curation: enabling a patient-centric European health data space

Frontiers Production Office

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1455319

2024-07-09

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1365501.].
Corrigendum to 'Impact of COVID-19 on immunocompromised populations during the Omicron era: insights from the observational population-based INFORM study' [The Lancet Regional Health - Europe 35 (2023) 100747]

Rachael A Evans,Sabada Dube,Yi Lu,Mark Yates,Sofie Arnetorp,Eleanor Barnes,Samira Bell,Lucy Carty,Kathryn Evans,Sophie Graham,Nahila Justo,Paul Moss,Sudhir Venkatesan,Renata Yokota,Catia Ferreira,Richard McNulty,Sylvia Taylor,Jennifer K Quint

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101008

2024-07-25

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100747.].
Corrigendum: Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study

Jakub Lickiewicz,Simone Agnes Efkemann,Tonje Lossius Husum,Tella Lantta,Luca Pingani,Richard Whittington

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1464977

2024-08-27

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1403094.].
Corrigendum: Minding mentalizing - convergent validity of the Mentalization Breakdown Interview

Dag Anders Ulvestad,Merete Selsbakk Johansen,Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein,Geir Pedersen,Theresa Wilberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1479612

2024-08-21

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1380532.].
Erratum: Moving psychiatric deinstitutionalization forward: A scoping review of barriers and facilitators - CORRIGENDUM

Cristian Montenegro,Matías Irarrázaval Dominguez,Josefa González Moller,Felicity Thomas,Jorge Urrutia Ortiz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.87

2023-12-13

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2023.18.].
Corrigendum/Erratum to "Treatment coverage for depression in the general Spanish population and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic" [Heliyon 10(11) June 2024 e32594]

Lea Francia,Riccardo De Giorgi,Elvira Lara,Blanca Dolz Del Castellar,Chiara Castelletti,Cristina Rodríguez-Prada,Joan Domènech-Abella,Beatriz Olaya,Josep Maria Haro,José Luis Ayuso Mateos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34571

IF: 3.776

2024-07-15

Heliyon

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32594.].
Correction: Data Integrity Issues With Web-Based Studies: An Institutional Example of a Widespread Challenge

Blandine French,Camilla Babbage,Katherine Bird,Lauren Marsh,Mirabel Pelton,Shireen Patel,Sarah Cassidy,Stefan Rennick-Egglestone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/67286

2024-10-18

JMIR Mental Health

Abstract:Related Article Correction of: https://mental.jmir.org/2024/1/e58432/

psychiatry
Erratum: Scaling up the task-sharing of psychological therapies: A formative study of the PEERS smartphone application for supervision and quality assurance in rural India - CORRIGENDUM

Daisy R Singla,Luanna Fernandes,Katarina Savel,Ankita Shah,Ravindra Agrawal,Anant Bhan,Abhijit Nadkarni,Akshita Sharma,Azaz Khan,Anuja Lahiri,Deepak Tugnawat,Neal Lesh,Vikram Patel,John Naslund

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.61

2024-05-30

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2024.11.].
Corrigendum to “individual and Societal Impact on Earnings Associated with Serious Mental Illness in Metropolitan China” [psychiatry Research 180 (2–3) (2010) 132–136]

Paul Lee,Adley Tsang,Yueqin Huang,Yi He,Zhaorui Liu,Mingyuan Zhang,Yucun Shen,Ronald C. Kessler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.02.016

IF: 11.3

2011-01-01

Psychiatry Research

Abstract:a Hong Kong Mood Disorders Center, 7A, Block E, Staff Quarters, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong b Institute of Mental Health, Peking University, No.51 Hua Yuan Bei Road, Haidian District Beijing,100083, PR China c Shanghai Mental Health Center. 600 Wan Ping Nan Lu, Shanghai, 20030, PR China d Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Suite 215, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Corrigendum to “influence of on Emotions and Behavior of Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder” [heliyon 9(5) (may 2023) E15890]

Heli Lu,Zewen Huang,Lejun Zhang,Xiaoqin Huang,Xinyi Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19481

IF: 3.776

2023-01-01

Heliyon

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15890.].
FAIR data sharing: An international perspective on why medical researchers are lagging behind

Linda Rainey,Jennifer E Lutomski,Mireille JM Broeders

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231171052

2023-05-07

Big Data & Society

Abstract:Big Data &Society, Volume 10, Issue 1, January-June 2023. FAIR data, that is, Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable data, and Big Data intersect across issues related to data storage, access, and processing. The solution-oriented FAIR principles serve an integral role in improving Big Data; yet to date, the implementation of FAIR in multiple sectors has been fragmented. We conducted an exploratory analysis to identify incentives and barriers in creating FAIR data in the medical sector using digital concept mapping, a systematic mixed methods approach. Thirty-eight principal investigators (PIs) were recruited from North America, Europe, and Oceania. Our analysis revealed five clusters rated according to perceived relevance: 'Efficiency and collaboration' (rating 7.23), 'Privacy and security' (rating 7.18), 'Data management standards' (rating 7.16), 'Organization of services' (rating 6.98), and 'Ownership' (rating 6.28). All five clusters scored relatively high and within a narrow range (i.e., 6.28–7.69), implying that each cluster likely influences researchers' decision-making processes. PIs harbor a positive view of FAIR data sharing, as exemplified by participants highly prioritizing 'Efficiency and collaboration'. However, the other four clusters received only modestly lower ratings and largely contained barriers to FAIR data sharing. When viewed collectively, the benefits of efficiency and collaboration may not be sufficient in propelling FAIR data sharing. Arguably, until more of these reported barriers are addressed, widespread support of FAIR data will not translate into widespread practice. This research lays the preliminary foundation for conducting targeted large-scale research into FAIR data practices in the medical research community.

social sciences, interdisciplinary
Corrigendum: Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Correlates of Poor Mental Health Among Older Adults in Agricultural Areas of China

Yu Jin,Yun-Shu Zhang,Qinge Zhang,Wen-Wang Rao,Li-Li Zhang,Li-Jun Cui,Jian-Feng Li,Lin Li,Gabor S. Ungvari,Todd Jackson,Ke-Qing Li,Yu-Tao Xiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.664145

IF: 4.7

2021-03-10

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.549148.].

psychiatry
Implementing Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) Principles in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Research: Mixed Methods Approach

Rowdy de Groot,Frank van der Graaff,Daniël van der Doelen,Michiel Luijten,Ronald De Meyer,Hekmat Alrouh,Hedy van Oers,Jacintha Tieskens,Josjan Zijlmans,Meike Bartels,Arne Popma,Nicolette de Keizer,Ronald Cornet,Tinca J C Polderman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/59113

2024-12-19

Abstract:Background: The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles are a guideline to improve the reusability of data. However, properly implementing these principles is challenging due to a wide range of barriers. objectives: To further the field of FAIR data, this study aimed to systematically identify barriers regarding implementing the FAIR principles in the area of child and adolescent mental health research, define the most challenging barriers, and provide recommendations for these barriers. Methods: Three sources were used as input to identify barriers: (1) evaluation of the implementation process of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model by 3 data managers; (2) interviews with experts on mental health research, reusable health data, and data quality; and (3) a rapid literature review. All barriers were categorized according to type as described previously, the affected FAIR principle, a category to add detail about the origin of the barrier, and whether a barrier was mental health specific. The barriers were assessed and ranked on impact with the data managers using the Delphi method. Results: Thirteen barriers were identified by the data managers, 7 were identified by the experts, and 30 barriers were extracted from the literature. This resulted in 45 unique barriers. The characteristics that were most assigned to the barriers were, respectively, external type (n=32/45; eg, organizational policy preventing the use of required software), tooling category (n=19/45; ie, software and databases), all FAIR principles (n=15/45), and not mental health specific (n=43/45). Consensus on ranking the scores of the barriers was reached after 2 rounds of the Delphi method. The most important recommendations to overcome the barriers are adding a FAIR data steward to the research team, accessible step-by-step guides, and ensuring sustainable funding for the implementation and long-term use of FAIR data. Conclusions: By systematically listing these barriers and providing recommendations, we intend to enhance the awareness of researchers and grant providers that making data FAIR demands specific expertise, available tooling, and proper investments.
Data sharing and re-use in the traumatic stress field: An international survey of trauma researchers

Krithika Prakash,Nancy Kassam-Adams,Lonneke I M Lenferink,Talya Greene

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2023.2254118

Abstract:Background: The FAIR data principles aim to make scientific data more Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. In the field of traumatic stress research, FAIR data practices can help accelerate scientific advances to improve clinical practice and can reduce participant burden. Previous studies have identified factors that influence data sharing and re-use among scientists, such as normative pressure, perceived career benefit, scholarly altruism, and availability of data repositories. No prior study has examined researcher views and practices regarding data sharing and re-use in the traumatic stress field. Objective: To investigate the perspectives and practices of traumatic stress researchers around the world concerning data sharing, re-use, and the implementation of FAIR data principles in order to inform development of a FAIR Data Toolkit for traumatic stress researchers. Method: A total of 222 researchers from 28 countries participated in an online survey available in seven languages, assessing their views on data sharing and re-use, current practices, and potential facilitators and barriers to adopting FAIR data principles. Results: The majority of participants held a positive outlook towards data sharing and re-use, endorsing strong scholarly altruism, ethical considerations supporting data sharing, and perceiving data re-use as advantageous for improving research quality and advancing the field. Results were largely consistent with prior surveys of scientists across a wide range of disciplines. A significant proportion of respondents reported instances of data sharing and re-use, but gold standard practices such as formally depositing data in established repositories were reported as infrequent. The study identifies potential barriers such as time constraints, funding, and familiarity with FAIR principles. Conclusions: These results carry crucial implications for promoting change and devising a FAIR Data Toolkit tailored for traumatic stress researchers, emphasizing aspects such as study planning, data preservation, metadata standardization, endorsing data re-use, and establishing metrics to assess scientific and societal impact.
Corrigendum to "Proceedings from the MENA Congress for Rare Diseases, 16-19 May 2024, Abu Dhabi, UAE"

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040241264101

2024-06-19

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1177/26330040241238936.].
COVID-19-related research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles: A meta-research study

Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi,Eero Raittio,Yeganeh Khazaei,Javed Ashraf,Falk Schwendicke,Sergio E. Uribe,David Moher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313991

IF: 3.7

2024-11-24

PLoS ONE

Abstract:According to the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable), scientific research data should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to massive research activities and an unprecedented number of topical publications in a short time. However, no evaluation has assessed whether this COVID-19-related research data has complied with FAIR principles (or FAIRness). Our objective was to investigate the availability of open data in COVID-19-related research and to assess compliance with FAIRness. We conducted a comprehensive search and retrieved all open-access articles related to COVID-19 from journals indexed in PubMed, available in the Europe PubMed Central database, published from January 2020 through June 2023, using the metareadr package. Using rtransparent , a validated automated tool, we identified articles with links to their raw data hosted in a public repository. We then screened the link and included those repositories that included data specifically for their pertaining paper. Subsequently, we automatically assessed the adherence of the repositories to the FAIR principles using FAIRsFAIR Research Data Object Assessment Service (F-UJI) and rfuji package. The FAIR scores ranged from 1–22 and had four components. We reported descriptive analysis for each article type, journal category, and repository. We used linear regression models to find the most influential factors on the FAIRness of data. 5,700 URLs were included in the final analysis, sharing their data in a general-purpose repository. The mean (standard deviation, SD) level of compliance with FAIR metrics was 9.4 (4.88). The percentages of moderate or advanced compliance were as follows: Findability: 100.0%, Accessibility: 21.5%, Interoperability: 46.7%, and Reusability: 61.3%. The overall and component-wise monthly trends were consistent over the follow-up. Reviews (9.80, SD = 5.06, n = 160), articles in dental journals (13.67, SD = 3.51, n = 3) and Harvard Dataverse (15.79, SD = 3.65, n = 244) had the highest mean FAIRness scores, whereas letters (7.83, SD = 4.30, n = 55), articles in neuroscience journals (8.16, SD = 3.73, n = 63), and those deposited in GitHub (4.50, SD = 0.13, n = 2,152) showed the lowest scores. Regression models showed that the repository was the most influential factor on FAIRness scores (R 2 = 0.809). This paper underscored the potential for improvement across all facets of FAIR principles, specifically emphasizing Interoperability and Reusability in the data shared within general repositories during the COVID-19 pandemic.

multidisciplinary sciences

Opportunities for improving data sharing and FAIR data practices to advance global mental health–Corrigendum

Corrigendum to "An early economic evaluation of Kooth, a web-based mental health platform for children and young people with emerging mental health needs" [Internet Interv. 36 (2024) 100748 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100748 (Published online 2024 May 11)]

Erratum: Sociome Data Commons: A scalable and sustainable platform for investigating the full social context and determinants of health - ERRATUM

Erratum: Toward standardization, harmonization, and integration of social determinants of health data: A Texas Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions collaboration - CORRIGENDUM

Addendum: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

Erratum: Artificial intelligence based data curation: enabling a patient-centric European health data space

Corrigendum to 'Impact of COVID-19 on immunocompromised populations during the Omicron era: insights from the observational population-based INFORM study' [The Lancet Regional Health - Europe 35 (2023) 100747]

Corrigendum: Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study

Corrigendum: Minding mentalizing - convergent validity of the Mentalization Breakdown Interview

Erratum: Moving psychiatric deinstitutionalization forward: A scoping review of barriers and facilitators - CORRIGENDUM

Corrigendum/Erratum to "Treatment coverage for depression in the general Spanish population and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic" [Heliyon 10(11) June 2024 e32594]

Correction: Data Integrity Issues With Web-Based Studies: An Institutional Example of a Widespread Challenge

Erratum: Scaling up the task-sharing of psychological therapies: A formative study of the PEERS smartphone application for supervision and quality assurance in rural India - CORRIGENDUM

Corrigendum to “individual and Societal Impact on Earnings Associated with Serious Mental Illness in Metropolitan China” [psychiatry Research 180 (2–3) (2010) 132–136]

Corrigendum to “influence of on Emotions and Behavior of Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder” [heliyon 9(5) (may 2023) E15890]

FAIR data sharing: An international perspective on why medical researchers are lagging behind

Corrigendum: Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Correlates of Poor Mental Health Among Older Adults in Agricultural Areas of China

Implementing Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) Principles in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Research: Mixed Methods Approach

Data sharing and re-use in the traumatic stress field: An international survey of trauma researchers

Corrigendum to "Proceedings from the MENA Congress for Rare Diseases, 16-19 May 2024, Abu Dhabi, UAE"

COVID-19-related research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles: A meta-research study