Abstract:Introduction: Coercion is frequently used in mental health practice. Since it overrides some patients' fundamental human rights, adequate use of coercion requires legal and ethical justifications. Having internationally standardised datasets to benchmark and monitor coercion reduction programs is desirable. However, only a few countries have specific, open, publicly accessible registries for this issue. Methods: This study aims to assemble expert opinions regarding strategies that might be feasible for promoting, developing, and implementing an integrated and differentiated coercion data collection system in Europe at national and international levels. A concept mapping methodology was followed, involving 59 experts from 27 countries in generating, sorting and rating strategies regarding relevance and feasibility. The experts were all researchers and/or practitioner members of an EU-COST-Action focused on coercion reduction Fostering and Strengthening Approaches to Reducing Coercion in European Mental Health Services (FOSTREN). Results: A hierarchical cluster analysis revealed a conceptual map of 41 strategies organized in seven clusters. These clusters fit into two higher-order domains: "Advancing Global Health Research: Collaboration, Accessibility, and Technological Innovations/Advancing International Research" and "Strategies for Comprehensive Healthcare Data Integration, Standardization, and Collaboration." Regarding the action with the higher priority, relevance was generally rated higher than feasibility. No differences could be found regarding the two domains regarding the relevance rating or feasibility of the respective strategies in those domains. The following strategies were rated as most relevant: "Collection of reliable data", "Implementation of nationwide register, including data on coercive measures", and "Equal understanding of different coercive measures". In analysing the differences in strategies between countries and their health prosperity, the overall rating did not differ substantially between the groups. Conclusion: The strategy rated as most relevant was the collection of reliable data in the nationwide health register, ensuring that countries share a standard understanding/definition of different coercive measures. Respondents did not consider the feasibility of establishing a shared European database for coercive measures to be high, nor did they envision the unification of mental health legislation in the future. There is some consensus on the most suitable strategies that can be adopted to enable international benchmarking of coercion in mental health settings.

Corrigendum: Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study

Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study

Corrigendum to "Eliciting and prioritising determinants of improved care in multimorbidity: A modified online Delphi study"

Corrigendum to Compulsory admission: are there differences between migrants and natives? Data from a psychiatric emergency service of an Italian metropolitan area” [Heliyon 9 (3) (March 2023) Article e14406]

Erratum: 313 Data-Driven Evaluation of Community Health Worker Program - CORRIGENDUM

Corrigendum to "Digital exclusion and functional dependence in older people: findings from five longitudinal cohort studies" eClinical Medicine 54 (2022) 101708

Corrigendum: Exploring the Relationship Between Users' Psychological Contracts and Their Knowledge Contribution in Online Health Communities

Corrigendum to 'Would you? "Effects of oxytocin on moral choices in forensic psychopathic patients" [Compr. Psychoneuroendocrinology (2024) 100245]

Corrigendum: Human mental workload: A survey and a novel inclusive definition

Opportunities for improving data sharing and FAIR data practices to advance global mental health–Corrigendum

Erratum: Scaling up the task-sharing of psychological therapies: A formative study of the PEERS smartphone application for supervision and quality assurance in rural India - CORRIGENDUM

Corrigendum: Reframing human trafficking awareness campaigns in the United States: goals, audience, and content

Corrigendum to "Communication, Cognition and Competency Development in Healthcare: A Model for Integrating Cognitive Ethnography and Communication Skills Training in Clinical Interventions"

Corrigendum to 'Impact of COVID-19 on immunocompromised populations during the Omicron era: insights from the observational population-based INFORM study' [The Lancet Regional Health - Europe 35 (2023) 100747]

Corrigendum to "Socioeconomic Status, Cultural Capital, and Social Capital in Adults: A Structural Equation Model" [Psicothema 34(1), 74-83].

Erratum: Bribery and the Role of Public Service Motivation and Social Value Orientation: A Multi-Site Experimental Study in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands

Corrigendum: Marital satisfaction, sex, age, marriage duration, religion, number of children, economic status, education, and collectivistic values: Data from 33 countries [Front. Psychol., 8, (2017) (1199)] DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01199

Erratum: Mapping child and adolescent mental health services and the interface during transition to adult services in six Swiss cantons

Erratum: Moving psychiatric deinstitutionalization forward: A scoping review of barriers and facilitators - CORRIGENDUM

Erratum: Toward standardization, harmonization, and integration of social determinants of health data: A Texas Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions collaboration - CORRIGENDUM

Corrigendum: Socioeconomic status association with dependency from objective and subjective assessments: A cross-sectional study