Abstract:Objective: Medical conscientious objection is a federally protected right of physicians to refuse participation in medically indicated services or research activities that are incompatible with their ethical, moral, or religious beliefs. Individual provider objections to gender-affirming surgery have been documented, however the prevalence of such objections is unknown. Our study aimed to characterize physician objections to gender-affirming surgery in plastic surgery and urology residencies and to assess related institutional policies. Design, setting, participants: A cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to program leadership of 239 accredited US plastic surgery and urology residencies from February to October 2023. Trainee exposure to gender-affirming surgery, programmatic experience with objections, and presence and content of institutional objection policies were collected. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine associations with objectors. Results: One-hundred and twenty-four plastic surgery (n = 59) and urology (n = 65) residencies completed the survey, representing a 52% response rate. Most programs included didactic training (n = 107, 86%) and direct clinical exposure (n = 98, 79%) to gender-affirming surgery. Few (n = 24, 19%) endorsed existent objection policies. Sixteen programs (13%) experienced objections to gender-affirming surgery by trainees (n = 15), faculty (n = 6), and staff (n = 1). Neither geographic region, exposure to gender-affirming surgery, nor presence of objection policies significantly contributed to programmatic objections. Programs with formal objection policies reported increased confidence in addressing future objection events (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Objection to gender-affirming surgery is a rare, but plausible occurrence amongst plastic surgery and urology trainees. Residency programs should consider anticipatory policies to protect patients and, when feasible, provide reasonable accommodations for objecting trainees.

Assessing Public Reason Approaches to Conscientious Objection in Healthcare

The Reasonable Content of Conscience in Public Bioethics

Conscience, Disobedience, and Standard of Care

Understanding Conscientious Objection and the Acceptability of its Practice in Primary Care

Refusals and Requests: In Defense of Consistency

Freedom of Conscience in Health Care: Distinctions and Limits

Conscientious Objection and the Anesthesiologist: An Ethical Dilemma

Public Reason, Bioethics, and Public Policy: A Seductive Delusion or Ambitious Aspiration?

Three Arguments Against Institutional Conscientious Objection, and Why They Are (Metaphysically) Unconvincing

Professional responsibility, nurses, and conscientious objection: A framework for ethical evaluation

Reproductive health and blurred professional boundaries

When offering a patient beneficial treatment undermines public health

Conscientious Objection to Providing Gender Health Care in Pediatric Training: Balancing the Vulnerability of Transgender Youth and the Vulnerability of Pediatric Residents

Between the Reasonable and the Particular: Deflating Autonomy in the Legal Regulation of Informed Consent to Medical Treatment

Understanding the extent of and limitations to conscientious objection to abortion by health care practitioners: A hermeneutic study

Harmonizing conscience claims and patient access to assisted death

The religious character of secular arguments supporting euthanasia and what it implies for conscientious practice in medicine

A New Tool for Determining and Monitoring Public Healthcare Systems

When Fulfilling a Professional Obligation Causes Moral Distress: A New Evaluative Approach

Dignity, conscience and religious pluralism in healthcare: An argument for a presumption in favour of respect for religious belief

Conscientious Objection to Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Plastic Surgery and Urology Residency Programs