EDB Macroreview, June 2. EDB Economies: in Search of New Growth Drivers
Yaroslav Lissovolik,Aleksei Kuznetsov,Aigul Berdigulova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3206343
2018-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:The Russian version of this paper can be found at http://ssrn.com/abstract=3206347. The extent of global protectionism risks became obvious in the first half of 2. The US’s escalating trade dispute with the EU and China creates considerable risks to global economic growth, which brings additional risks of an energy price correction for the EDB countries. Apart from external economic risks, weakening existing growth drivers and the need for new sources to boost economic development become new and growing challenges facing the EDB countries. At the same time, the potential to stimulate economic activity with monetary policy tools has declined due to unprecedented low inflation and base rates of the largest EDB countries approaching neutral values. Resumed volatility in exchange rates and continuous medium-term inflation risks (high inflationary expectations) create additional obstacles to monetary stimuli in the short term. These conditions compel most of the EDB countries to look for new sources of growth to take advantage of favorable external conditions and accelerated integration processes taking place in the Eurasian region. One of the possible steps under the present conditions can be some softening in fiscal policy. Prospects of a fiscal stimulus emerged this year with the Russian President’s executive orders issued in May to provide additional financing to high-priority sectors, especially to those that support the development of human capital. According to the Russian Ministry of Finance’s estimates, additional expenditures can amount to up to RUB 8 trillion by 2020. Amid growing energy prices, there was an increase in spending in Kazakhstan in 1Q 2, by 13.5% YoY, compared to almost zero growth in the same period of the previous year. At the same time, social expenditures ( 20% YoY), particularly on healthcare ( 23.6% YoY), outpace overall expenditure growth. However, using the budget mechanism to stimulate economic activity has some limitations, including budget rules established in oil exporting countries, such as the RF. On the other hand, some countries, like Belarus and Armenia, need to reduce government debt. An increase in spending amid a rise in commodity prices may also increase EDB countries’ dependence on global economic conditions. Thus, in order to find additional growth drivers, the EDB countries have to take measures to increase efficiency and labor productivity in their economies and to improve the investment climate. It must be noted that the EDB countries have been actively adopting medium-term and long-term programs and strategies over the last year. This particularly relates to Kazakhstan, where a number of programs have been announced. The industrialization program progressed in 2017 and a comprehensive program called Digital Kazakhstan was approved. The Kazakhstan Strategic Development Plan to 2025 was approved in 2. It aims for high-quality and sustainable economic development and to raise living standards to the level of OECD countries. In March 2, the President of Kazakhstan announced five social initiatives: to make mortgages more affordable and higher education more available, to ease the tax burden on the most vulnerable part of the population, to develop microfinancing and to connect more households to gas. The Russian Ministry of Economic Development is developing measures to improve the business climate. The Transformation of the Business Environment Plan is reported by RBC to include 14 initiatives to protect property rights, develop human capital, grow productivity and improve corporate governance. Diminishing the share of the shadow economy can be a potential economic growth driver for the EDB countries. According to the IMF, the shadow economy in the EDB countries constitutes 32.8% of Kazakhstan’s GDP, 30.1% of Kyrgyzstan’s GDP, 32.4% of Belarus’s GDP, 37.8% of Tajikistan’s GDP, 36% of Armenia’s GDP, and 33.7% of Russia’s GDP. These estimates do not correspond to the countries’ official data due to differences in assessment methods applied. According to the Kazakhstan Statistics Committee, the shadow economy amounted to 25.8% of Kazakhstan’s GDP in 2016 and 23.8% of Kyrgyzstan’s GDP (the data for 2015 does not cover the agricultural sector). No matter how you calculate it, though, the share of the shadow economy is high. However, all conditions currently exist to decrease it. By decreasing the shadow economy, it will be possible to increase budget revenues, distribute revenues more equally, and improve the business climate and economy in general. Domestic growth drivers become more important for the EDB countries, considering increasing global risks. Reforms to boost economic activity are better to implement when global economic conditions are relatively favorable. Such measures can be further coordinated by the EDB countries to benefit from the synergy from regional economic integration, which has become a key growth factor in recent years.