Abstract:256 Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated that physician perceptions of patient priorities and patients’ stated preferences differ substantially. Use of preference clarification using discrete choice experiments (DCEs) has been shown to improve preference-concordance for patients with solid tumors. Previously, we developed a DCE to describe preferences of survivors of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We sought to evaluate this DCE among newly diagnosed patients with AML to inform shared decision-making. Methods: We used a sequential explanatory (quantitative to qualitative) mixed methods design to assess acceptability, feasibility, and content validity of the DCE to elicit individual preferences. Newly diagnosed older (≥ 60 years) adults with AML completed the DCE at the time of treatment decision. Patients and caregivers then completed semi-structured interviews to expand on quantitative findings. Based on initial results, healthy volunteers completed think-aloud sessions while completing the DCE and semi-structured interviews to further evaluate comprehensibility. Results: 47 participants were enrolled (18 patients [8 female, 10 male; aged 60-87], 16 caregivers, 15 healthy volunteers). Patients received best supportive care (n = 1), hypomethylating agents (n = 9), and high-intensity chemotherapy (n = 8). Feasibility/Acceptability: All patients completed the DCE (100% feasibility), and all reported that they answered according to their preferences (100% acceptability). Content Validity: 1) Relevance: 17/18 (94%) felt the DCE was relevant. 2) Comprehensiveness: In addition to the attributes in the DCE, provider recommendations and family considerations were noted to be critical in treatment decision-making. 3) Comprehensibility: Only 13/18 (72%) felt the DCE was easy to understand, and 14/18 (78%) felt it was easy to answer. Explanatory Interviews: Patients reported being in “shock,” “devastated” from receiving the diagnosis, feeling overwhelmed (“I was floored”) and not being able to reliably concentrate on the DCE due to these factors. Caregivers corroborated patients’ reports. Healthy volunteers also reported “information overload” and that the DCE was “technical” and the included outcome levels were “confusing.”. Conclusions: This DCE designed for older adults with AML was relevant, feasible, and acceptable. However, nearly 30% of patients reported difficulty understanding the DCE. Some reported not being able to attend to the complex tasks in the DCE, thereby compromising content validity of the measure. We suspect this was due to the distress caused by the diagnosis. This study demonstrates the challenge of developing valid preference elicitation instruments for newly diagnosed patients and highlights the need for extensive evaluation prior to clinical implementation.

Preferences of cancer survivors for follow-up care: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments

Eliciting Older Cancer Patients' Preferences for Follow-Up Care to Inform a Primary Healthcare Follow-Up Model in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Cancer survivor preferences for breast cancer follow-up care: a discrete choice experiment

Whether preferences of gastric cancer patients after surgery for follow-up change over time? Analysis based on discrete choice experiment

Information needs preferences of Chinese colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A discrete choice experiment

A Study of Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Non–small Cell Lung Cancer in Western China: A Discrete-Choice Experiment

Preferred Lung Cancer Screening Modalities in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Preferences for Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments

Patient Preferences for Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Study in China

Trade-offs between overall survival and side effects in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: eliciting preferences of patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer using a discrete choice experiment

Stated Preferences in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Evaluating a patient-centered discrete choice experiment to quantify individual treatment preferences of newly diagnosed older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A mixed methods study.

A systematic review of discrete choice experiments in stroke rehabilitation

Eliciting Preferences of Providers in Primary Care Settings for Post Hospital Discharge Patient Follow-Up

Novel application of discrete choice experiment methodology to understand how clinicians around the world triage palliative care needs: A research protocol

Understanding Clinician Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Oncology: A Discrete Choice Experiment of Oncologists' and Urologists' Preferences for First-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced/Unresectable Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Five European Countries

Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review

Patient and oncologist preferences for attributes of treatments in advanced melanoma: a discrete choice experiment

Patient and physician preferences for anticancer drugs for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a discrete-choice experiment

Identifying the unmet needs of post-treatment colorectal cancer survivors: A critical literature review

Patient Preferences for Investigating Cancer-Related Symptoms in Australian General Practice: A Discrete Choice Experiment