Abstract:Background: Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) and digital wearables (DW) are commonly used remote monitoring technologies that capture real-time data in people's natural environments. Real-time data are core to personalized medical care and intensively adaptive health interventions. The utility of such personalized care is contingent on user uptake and continued use of EMA and DW. Consequently, it is critical to understand user preferences that may increase the uptake of EMA and DW. Objective: The study aims to quantify users' preferences of EMA and DW, examine variations in users' preferences across demographic and behavioral subgroups, and assess the association between users' preferences and intentions to use EMA and DW. Methods: We will administer 2 discrete choice experiments (DCEs) paired with self-report surveys on the internet to a total of 3260 US adults through Qualtrics. The first DCE will assess participants' EMA preferences using a choice-based conjoint design that will ask participants to compare the relative importance of prompt frequency, number of questions per prompt, prompt type, health topic, and assessment duration. The second DCE will measure participants' DW preferences using a maximum difference scaling design that will quantify the relative importance of device characteristics, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating technical, health care, and market factors. Hierarchical Bayesian multinomial logistic regression models will be used to generate subject-specific preference utilities. Preference utilities will be compared across demographic (ie, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) and behavioral (ie, substance use, physical activity, dietary behavior, and sleep duration) subgroups. Regression models will determine whether specific utilities are associated with attitudes toward or intentions to use EMA and DW. Mixture models will determine the associations of attitudes toward and intentions to use EMA and DW with latent profiles of user preferences. Results: The institutional review board approved the study on December 19, 2022. Data collection started on January 20, 2023, and concluded on May 4, 2023. Data analysis is currently underway. Conclusions: The study will provide evidence on users' preferences of EMA and DW features that can improve initial uptake and potentially continued use of these remote monitoring tools. The sample size and composition allow for subgroup analysis by demographics and health behaviors and will provide evidence on associations between users' preferences and intentions to uptake EMA and DW. Limitations include the cross-sectional nature of the study, which limits our ability to measure direct behavior. Rather, we capture behavioral intentions for EMA and DW uptake. The nonprobability sample limits the generalizability of the results and introduces self-selection bias related to the demographic and behavioral characteristics of participants who belong to web-based survey panels.

A systematic review of discrete choice experiments in stroke rehabilitation

Patient and Public Acceptance of Digital Technologies in Health Care: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment

Discrete choice experiment to investigate preferences for psychological intervention in cardiac rehabilitation

A novel design process for selection of attributes for inclusion in discrete choice experiments: case study exploring variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke

Discrete choice experiment for eliciting preference for health services for patients with ALS and their informal caregivers

Unlocking Patient Voices: Advancing Physical Therapist Practice with Discrete Choice Experiments

One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation

What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review

Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design

Exploration of preferences among people with COPD to inform resource allocation: a discrete choice experiment study

Patient preferences for use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: Results from a discrete choice experiment

Preferences of cancer survivors for follow-up care: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments

Novel application of discrete choice experiment methodology to understand how clinicians around the world triage palliative care needs: A research protocol

Attribute Development in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Methods and Techniques to Inform Quantitative Instruments

Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study

Decision Trade-Offs in Ecological Momentary Assessments and Digital Wearables Uptake: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment

Patient preferences for the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation

Valuing Attributes of Home Palliative Care With Service Users: A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment

Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment

Understanding Preferences for Lifestyle-Focused Visual Text Messages in Patients With Cardiovascular and Chronic Respiratory Disease: Discrete Choice Experiment

Exercise Preference in Stroke Survivors: a Concept Analysis