Abstract:Molecular docking, the task of predicting the binding structures between a protein and a small molecule ligand, plays a significant role in structural-based drug discovery. In recent years, numerous deep learning-based methods for molecular docking have emerged. State-of-the-art approaches such as DiffDock formulate the docking problem using diffusion generative models, exhibiting superior performance than traditional docking algorithms. However, despite the strong performance of these deep learning-based docking methods in predicting binding poses, they often lack a well-defined scoring function. This limitation poses challenges in effectively distinguishing between the strong and weak inhibitors during virtual screening. To address this limitation, we introduce FeatureDock, a transformer-based deep learning framework, which can accurately predict the protein-ligand binding poses as well as achieve a strong scoring power for virtual screening. FeatureDock extracts chemical features from local environments within protein structures and utilizes a Transformer encoder to predict probability density envelopes indicating where ligands are most likely to bind in the protein pocket. We also designed a scoring function, which encodes the predicted probability density envelope, to optimize and score the ligand poses. In addition, the attention mechanism in FeatureDock’s Transformer further enhances the model’s interpretability by providing the attention weights of each chemical feature from the protein structures in predicting the binding probabilities. When applied to virtual screening, we demonstrated that FeatureDock outperforms DiffDock, Smina and AutoDock Vina in distinguishing strong inhibitors from weak ones for both Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 (CDK2, an inactivated form) and Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). The performance was assessed using Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC) evaluation metrics. We also demonstrate that FeatureDock can accurately predict the binding poses, achieving an average RMSD of 2.4 Å when compared to CDK2-ligand co-crystal structures. We anticipate that our FeatureDock holds promise to be widely applied in virtual screening to assist in drug design. FeatureDock is available at https://github.com/xuhuihuang/featuredock.

A Point Cloud-Based Deep Learning Model for Protein Docking Decoys Evaluation

Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks

Protein Docking Model Evaluation by Graph Neural Networks

Assessment of Protein-Protein Docking Models Using Deep Learning

SurfPro-NN: A 3D point cloud neural network for the scoring of protein–protein docking models based on surfaces features and protein language models

Neural Probabilistic Protein-Protein Docking Via a Differentiable Energy Model

A Point Cloud-Based Deep Learning Strategy for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Do Deep Learning Models Really Outperform Traditional Approaches in Molecular Docking?

DeepBSP—a Machine Learning Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein–Ligand Docking Structures

DeepDock: Enhancing Ligand-protein Interaction Prediction by a Combination of Ligand and Structure Information

Deep Learning for Protein-Ligand Docking: Are We There Yet?

Combining Docking Pose Rank and Structure with Deep Learning Improves Protein–Ligand Binding Mode Prediction over a Baseline Docking Approach

DiffDock-PP: Rigid Protein-Protein Docking with Diffusion Models

Boosting Deep Learning-based Docking with Cross-attention and Centrality Embedding

Exploration on Learning Molecular Docking with Deep Learning Models

PoseBusters: AI-based docking methods fail to generate physically valid poses or generalise to novel sequences

FeatureDock: Protein-Ligand Docking Guided by Physicochemical Feature-Based Local Environment Learning using Transformer

Unified Sampling and Ranking for Protein Docking with DFMDock

AQDnet: Deep Neural Network for Protein–Ligand Docking Simulation

EuDockScore: euclidean graph neural networks for scoring protein-protein interfaces