Multi-Cancer PRS Constellation Model for Cancer Risk Prediction
Núria Moragas,Anna Díez-Villanueva,Ferran Moratalla-Navarro,Pablo Fernández-Navarro,Beatriz Pérez-Gómez,María Morales Suárez-Varela,Ana Molina-Barceló,Gemma Castaño-Vinyals,Blanca Rius Sansalvador,Lois Riobó-Mayo,Rocio Olmedo-Requena,José-Juan Jiménez-Moleón,Rafael Marcos-Gragera,Marcela Guevara,Guillermo Fernandez-Tardon,Pilar Amiano Exezarreta,José M. Huerta,Tania Fernández-Villa,Antonio José Molina de la Torre,Vicente Martín-Sánchez,Inés Gómez-Acebo,Trinidad Dierssen,Juan Alguacil,Elisabet Guinó,Manolis Kogevinas,Marina Pollán,Mireia Obón-Santacana,Victor Moreno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.17.24315686
2024-10-18
Abstract:Cancer development is influenced by genetic factors and modifiable exposures. GWAS has identified genetic variants and developed of prediction models through Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS), but PRS alone has limitations for estimating cancer risk. This study assesses a novel PRS constellation approach that integrates Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) from both lifestyle and genetic traits to enhance prediction models for colorectal, breast, and prostate can-cers. The approach was developed using the UK Biobank dataset and validated in the independent Gen-Risk cohort. The model, incorporating sex and age, achieved AUCs of 0.74 for CRC, 0.65 for BC, and 0.75 for PC in the UK Biobank. Including tumor-related PRSs improved PC prediction but had limited impact on CRC and BC. Age and sex inclusion boosted CRC and PC model accuracy. However, GenRisk valida-tion showed reduced AUCs and limited utility of lifestyle PRSs, with CRC and BC models achieving 0.62 and PC 0.56. Integrating lifestyle-related characteristics into PRS does not significantly enhance cancer-specific PRS prediction. However, PRSs for these traits show independent predictive power, highlighting the importance of considering lifestyle in cancer risk and the need for precision medicine to im-prove early detection.
Genetic and Genomic Medicine