Abstract:There is currently much interest in conducting spatial analyses of health outcomes at the small-area scale. This requires sophisticated statistical techniques, usually involving Bayesian models, to smooth the underlying risk estimates because the data are typically sparse. However, questions have been raised about the performance of these models for recovering the "true" risk surface, about the influence of the prior structure specified, and about the amount of smoothing of the risks that is actually performed. We describe a comprehensive simulation study designed to address these questions. Our results show that Bayesian disease-mapping models are essentially conservative, with high specificity even in situations with very sparse data but low sensitivity if the raised-risk areas have only a moderate (less than 2-fold) excess or are not based on substantial expected counts (> 50 per area). Semiparametric spatial mixture models typically produce less smoothing than their conditional autoregressive counterpart when there is sufficient information in the data (moderate-size expected count and/or high true excess risk). Sensitivity may be improved by exploiting the whole posterior distribution to try to detect true raised-risk areas rather than just reporting and mapping the mean posterior relative risk. For the widely used conditional autoregressive model, we show that a decision rule based on computing the probability that the relative risk is above 1 with a cutoff between 70 and 80% gives a specific rule with reasonable sensitivity for a range of scenarios having moderate expected counts (approximately 20) and excess risks (approximately 1.5- to 2-fold). Larger (3-fold) excess risks are detected almost certainly using this rule, even when based on small expected counts, although the mean of the posterior distribution is typically smoothed to about half the true value.

A Bayesian semi-parametric model for colorectal cancer incidences

Bayesian statistics in spatial epidemiology]

A Bayesian Model for Spatial Partly Interval-Censored Data

Spatial extended hazard model with application to prostate cancer survival

A Bayesian Semiparametric Temporally-Stratified Proportional Hazards Model with Spatial Frailties

Bayesian inference in time-varying additive hazards models with applications to disease mapping

Bayesian modelling of inseparable space-time variation in disease risk

Bayesian cure-rate survival model with spatially structured censoring

A Nonseparable Multivariate Space-Time Model for Analyzing County-Level Heart Disease Death Rates by Race and Gender

Spatial-temporal Bayesian accelerated failure time models for survival endpoints with applications to prostate cancer registry data

A Bayesian piecewise survival cure rate model for spatially clustered data

Analysis of Minnesota colon and rectum cancer point patterns with spatial and nonspatial covariate information

Generalized accelerated failure time spatial frailty model for arbitrarily censored data

Cluster detection and risk estimation for spatio-temporal health data

A bayesian hierarchical spatial model for dental caries assessment using non-gaussian markov random fields.

Bayesian transformation model for spatial partly interval-censored data

Analysis of recurrent event data with spatial random effects using a Bayesian approach

A Bayesian multivariate spatial approach for illness-death survival models

Scalable Bayesian modeling for smoothing disease risks in large spatial data sets

Colorectal cancer risk mapping through Bayesian Networks

Interpreting posterior relative risk estimates in disease-mapping studies