Abstract:Just exactly which tree(s) should we assume when testing evolutionary hypotheses? This question has plagued comparative biologists for decades. Given a perfectly estimated tree (if this is even possible in practice), we seldom know with certainty whether such a tree is truly best (or even adequate) to represent the evolutionary history of our studied traits. Regardless of our certainty, choosing a tree is required for all phylogenetic comparative methods. Yet, phylogenetic conflict and error are ubiquitous in modern comparative biology, and we are still learning about their dangers when testing evolutionary hypotheses. Here we investigated the consequences of gene tree-species tree mismatch for phylogenetic regression in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting. Our simulation experiments reveal excessively high false positive rates for mismatched phylogenetic regression with both small and large trees, simple and complex traits, and known and estimated phylogenies. In some cases, we find evidence of a directionality of error: incorrectly assuming a species tree for traits that evolved according to a gene tree sometimes fares worse than the opposite. To explore difficult yet realistic regression scenarios, we also used estimated rather than known trees to conduct case studies, as well as an expansive gene expression dataset to investigate an arguably best-case scenario in which one may have a better chance to match tree with trait. Though never meant to be a panacea for all that may ail phylogenetic comparative methods, we found promise in the application of a robust estimator as a potential, albeit imperfect, solution to some issues raised by tree mismatch, perhaps offering a path forward. Collectively, our results emphasize the importance of careful study design for comparative methods, highlighting the need to fully appreciate the role of adequate phylogenetic modeling for testing evolutionary hypotheses.

The role of phylogenetics in comparative genetics

The Role of Phylogeny in Quantitative Paleobiological Data Analysis

Darwinian genomics and diversity in the tree of life

The promise and pitfalls of synteny in phylogenomics

The Evolution of Comparative Phylogeography: Putting the Geography (and More) into Comparative Population Genomics

Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution

Trees as a metaphor to understand relationships in biology

A tale of too many trees: a conundrum for phylogenetic regression

Tracing evolutionary links between species

Orchid phylogenetics and evolution: history, current status and prospects

Integrating phylogenies into single-cell RNA sequencing analysis allows comparisons across species, genes, and cells

Phylodynamics for cell biologists

Phylogeny Reconstruction in the Study of Molecular Evolution

The Inference of Gene Trees with Species Trees

A roadmap of phylogenomic methods for studying polyploid plant genera

Advances and challenges in resolving the angiosperm phylogeny

Comparative Phylogenomics, a Stepping Stone for Bird Biodiversity Studies

Phylotranscriptomic analyses in plants using Betulaceae as an example

Unification of species, gene, and cell trees for single-cell expression analyses

The Theory of Gene Family Histories

The historical role of species from the Solanaceae plant family in genetic research