Abstract:A key challenge in microbial phylogenomics is that microbial gene families are often affected by extensive horizontal gene transfer (HGT). As a result, most existing methods for microbial phylogenomics can only make use of a small subset of the gene families present in the microbial genomes under consideration, potentially biasing their results and affecting their accuracy. To address this challenge, several methods have recently been developed for inferring microbial species trees from genome-scale datasets of gene families affected by evolutionary events such as HGT, gene duplication, and gene loss. In this work, we use extensive simulated and real biological datasets to systematically assess the accuracies of four recently developed methods for microbial phylogenomics, SpeciesRax, ASTRAL-Pro 2, PhyloGTP, and AleRax, under a range of different conditions. Our analysis reveals important insights into the relative performance of these methods on datasets with different characteristics, identifies shared weaknesses when analyzing complex biological datasets, and demonstrates the importance of accounting for gene tree inference error/uncertainty for improved species tree reconstruction. Among other results, we find that (i) AleRax, the only method that explicitly accounts for gene tree inference error/uncertainty, shows the best species tree reconstruction accuracy among all tested methods, (ii) PhyloGTP shows the best overall accuracy among methods that do not account for gene tree error and uncertainty, (iii) ASTRAL-Pro 2 is less accurate than the other methods across nearly all tested conditions, and (iv) explicitly accounting for gene tree inference error/uncertainty can lead to substantial improvements in species tree reconstruction accuracy. Importantly, we also find that all methods, including AleRax and PhyloGTP, are susceptible to biases present in complex real biological datasets and can sometimes yield misleading phylogenies.

Phylogeny Reconstruction in the Study of Molecular Evolution

[Introduction to the Methods of Constructing Phylogenetic Trees with DNA Sequences].

Non-coding Nuclear DNA Markers in Phylogenetic Reconstruction

Ancient DNA Study and its Progress in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology

Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution

Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses and Real Life Data

[Recent progress in plant molecular population genetics]

Phylogeny Reconstruction Based on Protein Phylogenetic Profiles of Organisms*

Applied Aspects of Methods to Infer Phylogenetic Relationships Amongst Fungi

Tracing evolutionary links between species

Species, Clusters and the 'Tree of Life': A graph-theoretic perspective

Molecular Phylogenetics of Amphibians and Reptiles

[Phylogenetic Diversity of Microbes and Its Perspectives in Conservation Biology].

Importance of Synonymous Substitutions under Dense Taxon Sampling and Appropriate Modeling in Reconstructing the Mitogenomic Tree of Eutheria.

The Inference of Gene Trees with Species Trees

The promise and pitfalls of synteny in phylogenomics

Phylogeny of Twenty-One Mammals

Analysis of Phylogeny Tracking Algorithms for Serial and Multiprocess Applications

Construction of Phylogenetic Tree Based on DNA Sequences

Improved Core Genes Prediction for Constructing well-supported Phylogenetic Trees in large sets of Plant Species

A systematic assessment of phylogenomic approaches for microbial species tree reconstruction