Abstract:The recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) increase the hope that AI can provide a powerful tool to facilitate scientific discovery and to generate and validate new ideas for scientific research autonomously. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT4 have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating human-like text. Their potential extends beyond simple language tasks, offering transformative possibilities in scientific research of all fields. By leveraging vast amounts of data and advanced computational power, LLMs can assist researchers in generating novel ideas, automating routine tasks, and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations. On September 12, 2024, OpenAI released their updated generative artificial intelligence system called ChatGPTo1. This new AI system, built upon chain-of-thought and reinforcement learning, has greatly enhanced logical reasoning abilities and can effectively solve various complex problems from elementary-level mathematical problems to modern scientific research issues in physics, chemistry, and biology. Unlike previous LLMs in which logical reasoning and data analysis abilities are developed through training on actual data, ChatGPTo1 logical reasoning ability and capacity to generate new scientific ideas are primarily acquired through chain-of-thought processes and reinforcement learning rather than pre-training. To examine this, we specifically tested ChatGPTo1 current reasoning and scientific discovery capabilities by developing theoretically complex and quantitatively challenging scientific equations in various fields of neuroscience, such as dynamical systems, nonlinear dynamical systems, dynamical systems on differential manifolds, neural field theory, nonlinear divergence theorems, nonlinear heat conduction equations and Laplace equations and their extensions on differential manifolds, nonlinear statistical analysis methods, deep learning, and other topics involving multiple fields. The current large language models may illustrate a certain degree of general intelligence, even if fundamentally it may be different from human intelligence. However, it does not mean the current LLMs can fully apply such ability in practical applications or that their reasoning potential can be fully tapped. It is essential to explore specific pathways and methods to cultivate their potential for scientific discovery. To accomplish this, we consider how to integrate them with common search engines (such as Google) capabilities and ChatGPT4o cross-modal abilities to better understand new disciplines and scientific discoveries. To this point, the major shortcoming of ChatGPTo1 is that it is not an end-to-end scientific discovery method and lacks the ability to achieve full automation. It also lacks methods for image analysis and full-scale data analysis, making it difficult to use simulation and data analysis to evaluate and test proposed new theories and methods.

A kind of artificial intelligence model based on nature without statistic

An Intelligent Model with Chaos and Causality

A Simple Generative Model of Logical Reasoning and Statistical Learning

Machine learning for discovering laws of nature

Genes in Intelligent Agents

Learning with incomplete information - and the mathematical structure behind it

Do Machine Learning Models Learn Statistical Rules Inferred from Data?

AI without networks

A cyclical route linking fundamental mechanism and AI algorithm: An example from tuning Poisson's ratio in amorphous networks

A simple intelligent adaptive network

Dynamic Models of Neural Population Dynamics

Event prediction and causality inference despite incomplete information

Unsupervised logic-based mechanism inference for network-driven biological processes

Exploration Of A Mechanism To Form Bionic, Self-Growing And Self-Organizing Neural Network

Towards Understanding How Machines Can Learn Causal Overhypotheses

Causal Structure Learning Based on Genetic Algorithm and Markov Blanket

Artificial Intelligence is stupid and causal reasoning won't fix it

Aligning AI-driven discovery with human intuition

A Brain-Inspired Sequence Learning Model based on a Logic

Machine learning for Schrödinger’s cat paradox

Doing Experiments and Revising Rules with Natural Language and Probabilistic Reasoning