Abstract:Current sensing methods often ignore the fact that their sensing targets are dynamic and can change over time. As a result, to build an accurate model should not always be of the first priority. What we need is to establish an adaptive modelling framework. Lack of this adaptability hinders us from building a more intelligent sensing system. In this paper, we try to apply inspirations from human cognition to design a more intelligent sensing and modelling system, which can adaptively detect anomalies. Based on our understanding of free-energy and Infomax principle, the target of sensing and modelling is not to get as much data as possible, or to build the most accurate model, but to establish an adaptive representation of target and achieve balance between sensing performance and system resource consumption. Formally speaking, from the perspective of free energy minimization, this corresponds to a balance between accuracy and the minimization of complexity costs. To achieve this goal, we adopt a working memory mechanism to help the model evolve with the target; we use deep autoencoder network as model representation, which models complex data with its nonlinear and hierarchical architecture. Since we typically only have partial observations from sensed target, we design a variance of autoencoder that can reconstruct corrupted input. We utilize attentional surprise mechanism to control model update. Training of the deep network is driven by surprises detected (anomalies), which indicates model failure or target's new behaviour. Due to partial observations, we are not able to minimize free-energy in a single update, but iteratively minimize it by finding new optimization bounds. While both random and non-random sensor selection can create new optimization bounds, non-random methods like surprise minimization used in this paper demonstrate better performance. In our system, the model update frequency is controlled by several parameters, including surprise threshold and memory size. These parameters control the alertness as well as the resource consumption of the system in a top-down manner. For evaluation, we conducted experiments on simulated data to test whether our methodology makes the model more adaptive. The result showed that we achieved this aim. We also applied our method to a real application, which is EEG (Electroencephalography) seizure detection. This application shows features that we desired.

A simple intelligent adaptive network

Cognitive Sensing: Adaptive Anomalies Detection with Deep Networks

Adaptive Ant-Based Dynamic Routing Algorithm

Information Spreading Dynamics on Adaptive Social Networks

Adaptive Dynamical Networks

Adaptive control of dynamic networks

The wisdom of networks: A general adaptation and learning mechanism of complex systems: The network core triggers fast responses to known stimuli; innovations require the slow network periphery and are encoded by core-remodeling

Beyond networks, towards adaptive systems

Exploration Of A Mechanism To Form Bionic, Self-Growing And Self-Organizing Neural Network

On the Influence of Informed Agents on Learning and Adaptation over Networks

Dynamics of Adaptive Continuous Attractor Neural Networks

Adaptive Functional Network with Thermal Robustness

TDNetGen: Empowering Complex Network Resilience Prediction with Generative Augmentation of Topology and Dynamics

Design Principles for Perfect Adaptation in Biological Networks with Nonlinear Dynamics

Structure and Control of Biology-inspired Networks

Emergent Criticality Through Adaptive Information Processing in Boolean Networks

Adaptive Dynamical Networks Via Neighborhood Information: Synchronization and Pinning Control

Adaptive rewiring of random neural networks generates convergent-divergent units

An Intelligent Adaptative Architecture for Wireless Communication in Complex Scenarios

On the Principles of Parsimony and Self-Consistency for the Emergence of Intelligence

Adaptive Neural Network For Node Classification In Dynamic Networks