Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objectives</h3><p>In patients at low clinical probability of acute aortic syndromes (AASs), decision on advanced aortic imaging is cumbersome. Integration of the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD‐RS) with D‐dimer (DD) provides a potential pipeline for standardized diagnostic rule‐out. We systematically reviewed and summarized supporting data.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Cross‐sectional studies assessing integration of ADD‐RS with DD for diagnosis of AASs were identified on MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web Of Science databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles, assessed quality and extracted data. The quality of design and reporting was evaluated with the QUADAS‐2 and STARD tools. Individual patient data were obtained, to allow analysis of both conventional (500 ng/mL) and age‐adjusted (DD<sub>age‐adj</sub>) DD cutoffs. Data were summarized for 4 diagnostic strategies combining ADD‐RS=0 or ≤1, with DD<500 ng/mL or <dd<sub>age‐adj</dd<sub></p></section>. The statistical heterogeneity of the diagnostic variables was estimated with Higgins' I<sup>2</sup>. Pooled values were calculated for variables showing non‐significant heterogeneity. <section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>After screening of 680 studies, 4 articles (including a total of 3804 patients) met inclusion criteria. One prospective study provided a low risk of bias/applicability concerns, while methodological limitations were found in the other 3 retrospective studies. Statistical heterogeneity was negligible for sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (LR) values, and significant for specificity and positive LR values of all diagnostic strategies. Pooled sensitivity was 99.9% (95%CI 99.3–100%, I<sup>2</sup>=0) for ADD‐RS=0 and DD<500 ng/mL or <dd<sub>age‐adj</dd<sub></p></section>, 98.9% (95%CI 97.9–99.9%, I<sup>2</sup>=0) for ADD‐RS≤1 and DD<500 ng/mL and 97.6% (95%CI 96.3–98.9%, I<sup>2</sup>=0) for ADD‐RS≤1 and DD<dd<sub>age‐adj</dd<sub>. <section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Despite methodological limitations, integration of ADD‐RS=0 or ≤1 with DD<500 ng/mL shows negligible heterogeneity and consistently high sensitivity across studies, thus supporting reliability for diagnostic rule‐out of AASs. Data supporting ADD‐RS=0 plus DD<sub>age‐adj</sub> appear preliminary and require further scrutiny. </p></section>

The combined use of D-dimer testing and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the early differential diagnosis of aortic dissection

The combined use of serum Raman spectroscopy and D dimer testing for the early diagnosis of acute aortic dissection

Diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer for acute aortic syndromes: Systematic review and meta-analysis

D-dimer As a Biomarker for Acute Aortic Dissection

Identification of Serum Biomarker in Acute Aortic Dissection by Global and Targeted Metabolomics

Combination of D-dimer Level and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Clinical Significance of D-dimer in Rapid Screening for Acute Aortic Dissection

D-dimer As a Biomarker for Acute Aortic Dissection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Admission D-dimer to lymphocyte counts ratio as a novel biomarker for predicting the in-hospital mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection

The value of combined detection D-dimer and NLR in judging the severity and short-term prognosis of acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism in elderly patients

Systematic Review of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D‐dimer for Diagnostic Rule‐out Of Suspected Acute Aortic Syndromes

D-dimer as a Rule-Out for Aortic Dissection

Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Predicting acute aortic syndrome using aortic dissection detection risk score, D-dimer, and X-ray

Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of mortality among aortic dissection patients in the emergency department

The association between lymphocyte-monocyte ratio and postoperative acute kidney injury in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

Diagnostic value of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio in acute aortic dissection in a Chinese han population

Efficacy of prognostic nutrition index in combination with D-dimer in predicting postoperative clinical adverse events after acute type A aortic dissection: a single center retrospective study

Association Between Preoperative D-dimer with Morphologic Features and Surgical Outcomes of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Analysis of D-dimer in Different Types and Stages of Aortic Dissection

[The value of D-dimer for etiological diagnosis of mortal chest pain: an analysis of 438 cases].