Systematic Review of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D‐dimer for Diagnostic Rule‐out Of Suspected Acute Aortic Syndromes

Paolo Bima,Emanuele Pivetta,Peiman Nazerian,Mamoru Toyofuku,Riccardo Gorla,Eduardo Bossone,Raimund Erbel,Enrico Lupia,Fulvio Morello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13969
2020-04-21
Academic Emergency Medicine
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objectives</h3><p>In patients at low clinical probability of acute aortic syndromes (AASs), decision on advanced aortic imaging is cumbersome. Integration of the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD‐RS) with D‐dimer (DD) provides a potential pipeline for standardized diagnostic rule‐out. We systematically reviewed and summarized supporting data.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Cross‐sectional studies assessing integration of ADD‐RS with DD for diagnosis of AASs were identified on MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web Of Science databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles, assessed quality and extracted data. The quality of design and reporting was evaluated with the QUADAS‐2 and STARD tools. Individual patient data were obtained, to allow analysis of both conventional (500 ng/mL) and age‐adjusted (DD<sub>age‐adj</sub>) DD cutoffs. Data were summarized for 4 diagnostic strategies combining ADD‐RS=0 or ≤1, with DD&lt;500 ng/mL or <dd<sub>age‐adj</dd<sub></p></section>. The statistical heterogeneity of the diagnostic variables was estimated with Higgins' I<sup>2</sup>. Pooled values were calculated for variables showing non‐significant heterogeneity. <section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>After screening of 680 studies, 4 articles (including a total of 3804 patients) met inclusion criteria. One prospective study provided a low risk of bias/applicability concerns, while methodological limitations were found in the other 3 retrospective studies. Statistical heterogeneity was negligible for sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (LR) values, and significant for specificity and positive LR values of all diagnostic strategies. Pooled sensitivity was 99.9% (95%CI 99.3–100%, I<sup>2</sup>=0) for ADD‐RS=0 and DD&lt;500 ng/mL or <dd<sub>age‐adj</dd<sub></p></section>, 98.9% (95%CI 97.9–99.9%, I<sup>2</sup>=0) for ADD‐RS≤1 and DD&lt;500 ng/mL and 97.6% (95%CI 96.3–98.9%, I<sup>2</sup>=0) for ADD‐RS≤1 and DD<dd<sub>age‐adj</dd<sub>. <section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Despite methodological limitations, integration of ADD‐RS=0 or ≤1 with DD&lt;500 ng/mL shows negligible heterogeneity and consistently high sensitivity across studies, thus supporting reliability for diagnostic rule‐out of AASs. Data supporting ADD‐RS=0 plus DD<sub>age‐adj</sub> appear preliminary and require further scrutiny. </p></section>
emergency medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?