Abstract:Background Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common operative procedure and many options regarding the type of the selected graft and fixation technique have been described to date. Although many studies have addressed the issue of the optimal femoral fixation device during ACLR with a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft, no clear evidence to indicate one technique over another has been found. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term postoperative outcomes and complication rates between transfemoral Cross-pin (CP) and Endobutton-Cortical Button (CB) fixation techniques in patients undergoing ACLR with an HT autograft. Methods One hundred and seven consecutive patients underwent ACLR by using a quadruple HT autograft that was stabilized with either a CP (CP Group: 52 patients) or a CB (CB Group: 55 patients) fixation technique. The Lachman test (LT), the Pivot-shift test (PST), the side-to-side difference in anterior translation of the tibia, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the Lysholm knee scoring systems were evaluated before surgery and during long-term follow up. The femoral and tibial tunnel diameter was measured in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs after surgery and at the final follow-up. A review of the literature was also carried out to identify any differences between both techniques. Results Study groups were comparable in terms of patient demographics. The mean follow-up was 10.4 ± 1.3 and 10.6 ± 1.3 years in the CP and CB Groups, respectively (p = 0.47). In the CP Group, improvements after surgery in LT and PST from grade 2 (n=34) or 3 (n=18) to grade 0 (n = 41) or 1 (n = 11) and from grade 2 (n=36) or 3 (n = 16) to grade 0 (n = 44) or 1 (n = 8), respectively, were observed. In the CB Group, similar improvements in LT and PST scores from grade 2 (n = 40) or 3 (n = 15) to grade 0 (n = 46) or 1 (n = 9) and from grade 2 (n = 41) or 3 (n = 14) to grade 0 (n = 47) or 1 (n = 8), respectively, were observed. However, no differences between the groups (p = 0.53 for LT and p = 0.90 for PST) were noted. The mean Lysholm scores were 89.7 ± 6.8 and 90.2 ± 7.2 in the CP and CB groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Side-to-side difference improved from 9.1 ± 2.8 to 1.7 ± 1.5 mm and from 8.6 ± 2.5 to 1.6 ± 1.4 mm in the CP and CB groups, respectively (p = 0.89 between groups). According to IKDC grades, 92.1% and 91.4% of knees in the CP and CB groups, respectively were reported to be Grade A (Normal) or B (Nearly Normal) with a p = 0.7. Femoral and tibial tunnel widening was found in the last follow-up in both groups. However, there was no difference in the degree of tunnel widening among the two techniques. With respect to LT, PST, anterior drawer test, and IKDC score, none of the 15 published comparative studies demonstrated any significant differences between the two techniques and only one study detected a difference regarding the Lysholm score in favor of CP fixation. Conclusion In the long term, both CB and CP femoral stabilization techniques were shown to be associated with similar functional outcomes and low complication rates. Further large multicenter random clinical trials are still required to identify the most effective method of femoral fixation for HT autograft during ACLR surgery.

Good clinical scores, no evidence of excessive anterior tibial translation, a high return to sport rate and a low re-injury rate is observed following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings augmented with suture tape

Return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament surgery with hamstring or patella tendon autograft - a systematic review

Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Independently Tensioned Suture Tape Augmentation at 5-Year Follow-up

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Controlled Accelerated Rehabilitation

Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in a Young Active Population

Eighteen-year outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft

Comparison of Cross-Pin Versus Cortical Button Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstrings Autograft: A Long-Term Clinical Study and Review of the Literature

Hamstring autografts demonstrate either similar or inferior outcomes to quadriceps or bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of comparative studies

Long-term results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft with a minimum follow-up of 10 years-a systematic review

Comparison of Results in ACL Reconstruction in Women under 30 Years Old at a Minimum of 2 Years' Follow-Up between a Bone–Tendon–Bone (BTB) Technique with the Patellar Tendon and a Hamstring Technique Combined with Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction

Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries With Special Reference to Surgical Technique and Rehabilitation: An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Associated With Increased Knee Valgus Moment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Analysis

Clinical and arthroscopic outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings augmented with ligament augmentation and reconstruction systems compared with four-strand hamstring tendon grafts alone

Insufficient Evidence for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Suture Tape Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 1-Year Follow-up

The Clinical Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Anterior Tibial Muscle Tendons Allograft and Hamstring Tendon Autograft

Autograft Versus Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Comparison of clinical outcomes of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: autogenous patellar tendon and hamstring grafts

Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Biologic Augmentation in Patients 21 Years of Age and Younger

Hamstring tendon graft with LARS augmentation showed superior short-term clinical efficacy compared to hamstring tendon alone as graft in ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

No difference in laxity, proprioception and neuromuscular control after suture-tape augmented ACL repair of acute proximal avulsions versus ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts in young, active population