Abstract:Introduction: 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a versatile technique to non-invasively assess cardiovascular hemodynamics. With developing technology, choice in sequences and acquisition parameters is expanding and it is important to assess if data acquired with these different variants can be directly compared, especially when combining datasets within research studies. For example, sequences may allow a choice in gating techniques or be limited to one method, yet there is not a direct comparison investigating how gating selection impacts quantifications of the great vessels, semilunar and atrioventricular valves and ventricles. Thus, this study investigated if quantifications across the heart from contemporary 4D flow sequences are comparable between two commonly used 4D flow sequences reliant on different ECG gating techniques. Methods: Forty participants (33 healthy controls, seven patients with coronary artery disease and abnormal diastolic function) were prospectively recruited into a single-centre observational study to undergo a 3T-CMR exam. Two acquisitions, a k-t GRAPPA 4D flow with prospective gating (4Dprosp) and a modern compressed sensing 4D flow with retrospective gating (4Dretro), were acquired in each participant. Images were analyzed for volumes, flow rates and velocities in the vessels and four valves, and for biventricular kinetic energy and flow components. Data was compared for group differences with paired t-tests and for agreement with Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation (ICC). Results: Measurements primarily occurring during systole of the great vessels, semilunar valves and both left and right ventricles did not differ between acquisition types (p > 0.05 from t-test) and yielded good to excellent agreement (ICC: 0.75-0.99). Similar findings were observed for the majority of parameters dependent on early diastole. However, measurements occurring in late diastole or those reliant on the entire-cardiac cycle such as flow component volumes along with diastolic kinetic energy values were not similar between 4Dprosp and 4Dretro acquisitions resulting in poor agreement (ICC < 0.50). Discussion: Direct comparison of measurements between two different 4D flow acquisitions reliant on different gating methods demonstrated systolic and early diastolic markers across the heart should be compatible when comparing these two 4D flow sequences. On the other hand, late diastolic and intraventricular parameters should be compared with caution.

Repeatability and reproducibility of various 4D Flow MRI postprocessing software programs in a multi-software and multi-vendor cross-over comparison study

The influence of post-processing software on quantitative results in 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations

Optimization of 4D Flow MRI Velocity Field in the Aorta with Divergence-Free Smoothing.

Inter-site comparability of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements in healthy traveling volunteers—a multi-site and multi-magnetic field strength study

Direct comparison of whole heart quantifications between different retrospective and prospective gated 4D flow CMR acquisitions

Editorial for “Traveling Volunteers – A Multi‐Vendor, Multi‐Center Study on Reproducibility and Comparability of 4D Flow Derived Aortic Hemodynamics in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance”

Patient Specific Hemodynamics: Combined 4d Flow-Sensitive Mri And Cfd

Verification Study of in Silico Computed Intracardiac Blood Flow With 4D Flow MRI

Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software

Repeatability and comparison of 2D and 4D flow MRI measurement of intracranial blood flow and pulsatility in healthy individuals and patients with cerebral small vessel disease

Coronary Flow Assessment Using Accelerated 4D Flow MRI With Respiratory Motion Correction

Comparing cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain software packages by their abilities to discriminate outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

A Systematic Review of 4D-Flow MRI Derived Mitral Regurgitation Quantification Methods

Four-Dimensional Flow MRI for Cardiovascular Evaluation (4DCarE): A Prospective Non-Inferiority Study of a Rapid Cardiac MRI Exam: Study Protocol and Pilot Analysis

Automatic measurement plane placement for 4D Flow MRI of the great vessels using deep learning

Quality Control for 4D Flow MR Imaging

Quantifying 3D MR fingerprinting (3D‐MRF) reproducibility across subjects, sessions, and scanners automatically using MNI atlases

Comparison of clinically available dynamic susceptibility contrast post processing software to differentiate progression from pseudoprogression in post-treatment high grade glioma

Prerequisites for Clinical Implementation of Whole‐Heart 4D‐Flow MRI: A Delphi Analysis

Hemodynamic Assessment of Structural Heart Disease Using 4D Flow MRI: How We Do It

4D Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Consensus Statement: 2023 Update